Perineural invasion is a prognostic factor in stage II colorectal cancer but not a treatment indicator for traditional chemotherapy: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) is considered a risk factor of survival but does not yet inform treatment decisions, and has not been studied separately in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients whose postoperative traditional chemotherapy is controversial. This cohort study aimed to assess the association of PNI with basic clinicopathological features and patient outcomes after curative resection and the effects of PNI on responses to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II CRC. Methods: The clinical data of 371 stage II CRC patients who underwent curative-intent surgery at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital in 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. The adjuvant chemotherapy data were acquired from follow-up information. PNI status was examined, and the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed. Results: PNI was detected in 82 of the 371 patients (22.1%) and was closely correlated with preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (P=0.030), gross tumor type (P=0.010), tumor differentiation (P=0.010), p stage (P<0.001), and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) (P<0.001). The median follow-up time was 71 months. The 5-year OS was 84.1% and 96.5% (P<0.001), and the 5-year DFS was 75.6% and 91.3% (P<0.001) for PNI-positive (+) and PNI-negative (-) patients, respectively. The multivariate regression analyses identified PNI as an independent negative prognostic factor for DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 2.95; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.546-5.626; P=0.001] and OS (HR: 3.966; 95% CI, 1.642-9.575; P=0.002). Among PNI (+) patients, DFS and OS were positively correlated with CEA levels (P=0.005 and P=0.004, respectively). Postoperative chemotherapy failed to improve DFS (P=0.480 and P=0.267, respectively) and OS (P=0.940 and P=0.077, respectively) regardless of whether the patients were PNI positive or not. Conclusions: In stage II CRC patients, PNI was a poor independent predictor for DFS and OS. Among PNI (+) patients, CEA levels were positively correlated with DFS and OS. Traditional postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve outcomes of PNI (+) patients. Therefore, as to the active role of PNI and vacancy for treatment in allusion to PNI, follow-up of PNI (+) patients with elevated CEA level should be strengthened and further research on drug conducted on PNI deserve to be carried on.