ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2022
Value of
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative PET or PET/CT for malignant diagnosis of Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Imaging Strategies and Research Advances in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- A Case of Solitary Fibrous Tumor of the Greater Omentum Incidentally Detected during Preoperative Evaluation for Thyroid Cancer.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Imaging findings of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of sigmoid colon: literature review and case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Clinical significance ofEuropean journal of medical research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Malignant primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) without treatment with imatinib are prone to bleeding and peritoneum implantation during operation. Therefore, preoperative assessment of the malignant potential of gGIST is essential. The use of Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with gGIST by pathology and underwent Results: The SUVmax, tumor diameter, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count of the 26 gGIST patients were 5.90±4.49, 7.40±4.92 cm, 7.62%±11.76%, (5.96±3.19)/50 high-power field (HPF), respectively. SUVmax was significantly correlated with GIST risk category, Ki-67 index, and mitotic count (r=0.855, 0.860, and 0.690, all P<0.01) but not with tumor diameter (r=0.383, P=0.054). The SUVmax of gGIST was 7.00±4.57 in the malignant group (moderate or high NIH risk category in 20 patients), which was significantly different from that (2.25±0.77) in the benign group (low or extremely low NIH risk category in 6 patients) ( Conclusions: SUVmax may be used as a complementary indicator for predicting the malignant potential of gGISTs before treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.