Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35557505›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2022

Alzheimer's Disease Assessments Optimized for Diagnostic Accuracy and Administration Time.

Niamh Mccombe, Xuemei Ding, Girijesh Prasad, Paddy Gillespie, David P Finn, Stephen Todd, Paula L Mcclean, Kongfatt Wong-Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Niamh MccombeIntelligent Systems Research CentreUlster University, Magee Campus Londonderry BT48 7JL U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6095-9748
Xuemei DingIntelligent Systems Research CentreUlster University, Magee Campus Londonderry BT48 7JL U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8644-4256
Girijesh PrasadIntelligent Systems Research CentreUlster University, Magee Campus Londonderry BT48 7JL U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-3284-9589
Paddy GillespieHealth Economic and Policy Analysis Centre, Discipline of EconomicsNational University of Ireland, Galway Galway H91 TK33 Ireland.
David P FinnGalway Neuroscience CentreDepartment of Pharmacology and TherapeuticsSchool of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway Galway H91 TK33 Ireland.
Stephen ToddAltnagelvin Area HospitalWestern Health and Social Care Trust Londonderry BT47 6SB U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-2312-9195
Paula L MccleanUlster University NI Centre for Stratified Medicine, Biomedical Sciences Research InstituteC-TRIC Londonderry BT47 6SB U.K.
Kongfatt Wong-LinIntelligent Systems Research CentreUlster University, Magee Campus Londonderry BT48 7JL U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8724-4398
University of Ulster · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IE

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the potential of machine learning techniques to improve dementia diagnostic processes, research outcomes are often not readily translated to or adopted in clinical practice. Importantly, the time taken to administer diagnostic assessment has yet to be taken into account in feature-selection based optimisation for dementia diagnosis. We address these issues by considering the impact of assessment time as a practical constraint for feature selection of cognitive and functional assessments in Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

methodsWe use three different feature selection algorithms to select informative subsets of dementia assessment items from a large open-source dementia dataset. We use cost-sensitive feature selection to optimise our feature selection results for assessment time as well as diagnostic accuracy. To encourage clinical adoption and further evaluation of our proposed accuracy-vs-cost optimisation algorithms, we also implement a sandbox-like toolbox with graphical user interface to evaluate user-chosen subsets of assessment items.

resultsWe find that there are subsets of accuracy-cost optimised assessment items that can perform better in terms of diagnostic accuracy and/or total assessment time than most other standard assessments. DISCUSSION: Overall, our analysis and accompanying sandbox tool can facilitate clinical users and other stakeholders to apply their own domain knowledge to analyse and decide which dementia diagnostic assessment items are useful, and aid the redesigning of dementia diagnostic assessments. Clinical Impact (Clinical Research): By optimising diagnostic accuracy and assessment time, we redesign predictive and efficient dementia diagnostic assessments and develop a sandbox interface to facilitate evaluation and testing by clinicians and non-specialists.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDementiaDisease ProgressionHumansSensitivity and Specificityassessment speed-accuracy trade-offcognitive and functional assessmentsCost-sensitive feature selectiondementia and Alzheimer’s disease diagnosissandbox GUI application

Identifiers

PMID35557505
PMCPMC9089816
OpenAlexW4226014063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.