Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35557033›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2022

Tomoko Akahane, Kenta Masuda, Akira Hirasawa, Yusuke Kobayashi, Arisa Ueki, Miho Kawaida, Kumiko Misu, Kohei Nakamura, Shimpei Nagai, Tatsuyuki Chiyoda and 9 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Tubal epithelial alterations: evolving concepts.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Multi-Faceted Analysis ShowingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular Management of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tomoko AkahaneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2678-0418
Kenta MasudaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4313-1636
Akira HirasawaCenter for Medical Genetics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4124-5488
Yusuke KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4503-2845
Arisa UekiGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9205-5452
Miho KawaidaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0353-4246
Kumiko MisuCenter for Medical Genetics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3862-3241
Kohei NakamuraGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5162-7132
Shimpei NagaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-2842
Tatsuyuki ChiyodaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8214-2242
Wataru YamagamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3925-6057
Shigenori HayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0671-3549
Fumio KataokaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International University of Health and Welfare School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-9273
Kouji BannoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2610-2833
Kokichi SuganoCenter for Medical Genetics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6729-366X
Hajime OkitaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0216-3263
Kenjiro KosakiCenter for Medical Genetics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6798-8151
Hiroshi NishiharaGenomics Unit, Keio Cancer Center, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5460-8703
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9596-8326
Keio University · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPOkayama University · JP

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI Grant 16K11155JSPS KAKENHI Grant 19K09833JSPS KAKENHI Grant 20K18174Keio Gijuku Academic Development Funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrecursor lesions may be identified in fallopian tube tissue after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in patients with pathogenic variants of

methodsWe analyzed the clinicopathological findings and conducted DNA sequencing for

results

conclusionThe sequence analysis for

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousFallopian Tube NeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsFallopian TubesFemaleHumansMutationSalpingo-oophorectomyTumor Suppressor Protein p53TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Carcinoma in SituCystadenocarcinoma, SerousGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2Genes, p53Prophylactic Surgical ProceduresSalpingo-Oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID35557033
PMCPMC9250861
OpenAlexW4226267599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.