Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35556148›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2022

Resting-state Networks in Tinnitus : A Scoping Review.

Tori Elyssa Kok, Deepti Domingo, Joshua Hassan, Alysha Vuong, Brenton Hordacre, Chris Clark, Panagiotis Katrakazas, Giriraj Singh Shekhawat

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Could DTI Unlock the Mystery of Subjective Tinnitus: It's Time for Parameters That Go A Little Out of the Routine.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review and Perspective on Brain Bases of Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  12. Eavesdropping on Tinnitus Using MEG: Lessons Learned and Future Perspectives.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Tinnitus and Multimodal Cortical Interaction.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tori Elyssa KokEar Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Deepti DomingoCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Joshua HassanCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Alysha VuongCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Brenton HordacreInnovation, IMPlementation and Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Chris ClarkGreat Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Department of Developmental Imaging and Biophysics, University College London, London, UK.
Panagiotis KatrakazasZelus P.C., Athens, Greece.
Giriraj Singh ShekhawatEar Institute, University College London, London, UK. giriraj.shekhawat@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8845-2401

Funding

National Institute for Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre 556183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic subjective tinnitus is the constant perception of a sound that has no physical source. Brain imaging studies show alterations in tinnitus patients' resting-state networks (RSNs). This scoping review aims to provide an overview of resting-state fMRI studies in tinnitus, and to evaluate the evidence for changes in different RSNs. A total of 29 studies were included, 26 of which found alterations in networks such as the auditory network, default mode network, attention networks, and visual network; however, there is a lack of reproducibility in the field which can be attributed to the use of different regions of interest and analytical methods per study, and tinnitus heterogeneity. Future studies should focus on replication by using the same regions of interest in their analysis of resting-state data, and by controlling adequately for potential confounds. These efforts could potentially lead to the identification of a biomarker for tinnitus in the future.

Indexed as

TinnitusBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNerve NetReproducibility of ResultsAuditory networkBrain imagingFunctional magnetic resonance imagingNeural networksReviewSubjective tinnitus

Identifiers

PMID35556148
PMCPMC9744700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.