Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35556143›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2022

Comparing the Liver Safety Profiles of 4 Next-Generation CGRP Receptor Antagonists to the Hepatotoxic CGRP Inhibitor Telcagepant Using Quantitative Systems Toxicology Modeling.

Jeffrey L Woodhead, Scott Q Siler, Brett A Howell, Paul B Watkins, Charles Conway

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Mechanisms of Migraine: Nitric Oxide Synthase and Neuropeptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey L WoodheadDILIsym Services, Inc., A Simulations Plus Company, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27706, USA.
Scott Q SilerDILIsym Services, Inc., A Simulations Plus Company, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27706, USA.
Brett A HowellDILIsym Services, Inc., A Simulations Plus Company, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27706, USA.
Paul B WatkinsInstitute for Drug Safety Sciences, UNC-Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-8917
Charles ConwayBiohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA.
Simulations Plus (United States) · USBiohaven Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling inhibitors have shown efficacy in both the acute and preventive treatment of migraine. Telcagepant, a first-generation CGRP receptor antagonist, was effective but failed in clinical trials due to hepatotoxicity. Subsequently, although 4 next-generation CGRP receptor antagonists (rimegepant, zavegepant, atogepant, and ubrogepant) were being advanced into late-stage clinical trials, due to telcagepant's failure, more confidence in the liver safety of these compounds was needed. DILIsym v6A, a quantitative systems toxicology (QST) model of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), was used to model all 5 compounds and thus to compare the 4 next-generation CGRP receptor antagonists to telcagepant. In vitro experiments were performed to measure the potential for each compound to inhibit bile acid transporters, produce oxidative stress, and cause mitochondrial dysfunction. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models were produced for each compound in order to appropriately estimate liver exposure. DILIsym predicted clinical elevations of liver enzymes and bilirubin for telcagepant, correctly predicting the observed DILI liability of the first-generation compound. By contrast, DILIsym predicted that each of the 4 next-generation compounds would be significantly less likely to cause DILI than telcagepant. Subsequent clinical trials have validated these predictions for each of the 4 compounds, and all 3 of the compounds submitted to FDA to date (rimegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant) have since been approved by the FDA with no warning for hepatotoxicity. This work demonstrates the potential for QST modeling to prospectively differentiate between hepatotoxic and nonhepatotoxic molecules within the same class.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAzepinesCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsComputer SimulationHumansImidazolesPiperidinesPyridinesPyrrolesSpiro CompoundsatogepantAzepinesCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsImidazolesPiperidinesPyridinesPyrrolesSpiro Compoundstelcagepantbiological modelingliver injurypharmaceuticalsquantitative systems toxicology

Identifiers

PMID35556143
PMCPMC9237996
OpenAlexW4280523654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.