Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35554731›Full record

ArticleThe AAPS journal2022

When to Extend Monitoring of Anti-drug Antibodies for High-risk Biotherapeutics in Clinical Trials: an Opinion from the European Immunogenicity Platform.

Gregor P Lotz, Karin Benstein, Karien Bloem, Harm Buddiger, Claudio Calonder, Stefanie Elm, Elena Fernandez, Joanne Goodman, Boris Gorovits, Joanna Grudzinska-Goebel and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The AAPS journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Gregor P LotzRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany. gregor.lotz@roche.com.
Karin BensteinSanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Industriepark Hoechst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Karien BloemBiologics Lab, Sanquin Diagnostic Services, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harm BuddigerGenmab B.V., Uppsalalaan 15, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Claudio CalonderNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefanie ElmAmgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Elena FernandezRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Joanne GoodmanIntegrated Bioanalysis, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, AstraZeneca, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, Cambridge, UK.
Boris GorovitsSana Biotechnology, Inc., MA, Cambridge, USA.
Joanna Grudzinska-GoebelBayer AG, Drug Metabolism & Pharmacokinetics, Berlin, Germany.
Melody JanssenSciPot Consultancy, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vibha JawaBristol Myers Squibb, Biotherapeutics and Bioanalysis Non-Clinical Development, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Daniel KramerSanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Industriepark Hoechst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Linlin LuoRegulated BA, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA.
Mantas MalisauskasMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Lydia MichautIntegrated Biologix, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin SchäferRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Sebastian SpindeldreherIntegrated Biologix, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin UllmannFresenius Kabi, Eysins, Switzerland.
Karin Nana WeldinghNovo Nordisk, Non-clinical & Clinical Assay Sciences, Maaloev, Denmark.
Arno KrommingaKromminga Consulting, Hamburg, Germany.
Veerle SnoeckUCB Biopharma SRL, Translational Biomarkers and Bioanalysis, Braine-l'Alleud, Belgium.
Roche Pharma AG (Germany) · DESanofi (Germany) · DEAmgen (Germany) · DEAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBBayer (Germany) · DEBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USGenmab (Netherlands) · NLKiel Institute for the World Economy · DEMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USMerck (Germany) · DENovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovo Nordisk (Denmark) · DKRoche (Switzerland) · CHSana Biotechnology (United States) · USSanquin · NLUCB Pharma (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The determination of a tailored anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing strategy is based on the immunogenicity risk assessment to allow a correlation of ADAs with changes to pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. The clinical impact of ADA formation refines the immunogenicity risk assessment and defines appropriate risk mitigation strategies. Health agencies request for high-risk biotherapeutics to extend ADA monitoring for patients that developed an ADA response to the drug until ADAs return to baseline levels. However, there is no common understanding in which cases an extension of ADA follow-up sampling beyond the end of study (EOS) defined in the clinical study protocol is required. Here, the Immunogenicity Strategy Working Group of the European Immunogenicity Platform (EIP) provides recommendations on requirements for an extension of ADA follow-up sampling in clinical studies where there is a high risk of serious consequences from ADAs. The importance of ADA evaluation during a treatment-free period is recognized but the decision whether to extend ADA monitoring at a predefined EOS should be based on evaluation of ADA data in the context of corresponding clinical signals. If the clinical data set shows that safety consequences are minor, mitigated, or resolved, further ADA monitoring may not be required despite potentially detectable ADAs above baseline. Extended ADA monitoring should be centered on individual patient benefit.

Indexed as

AntibodiesHumansAntibodiesADA follow-up samplingclinical trialsextended ADA monitoringimmunogenicityrisk mitigation

Identifiers

PMID35554731
OpenAlexW4280512263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.