Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35554681›Full record

ArticleOecologia2022

Sexual differences in phenotypical predictors of floating status: body condition influences male but not female reproductive status in a wild passerine.

Iraida Redondo, Lorenzo Pérez-Rodríguez, Raquel Monclús, Jaime Muriel, Diego Gil

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Not all who wander are lost: prospecting and settlement of male floaters in the spotless starling.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Iraida RedondoDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain. iraidaredondogar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-9279
Lorenzo Pérez-RodríguezInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo 12, 13005, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Raquel MonclúsLaboratoire d'Ethologie Expérimentale et Comparée UR 4443, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, 93430, Villetaneuse, France.
Jaime MurielDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain.
Diego GilDepartamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN), CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006, Madrid, Spain. diego.gil@csic.es.
Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales · ESInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos · ESSorbonne Université · FRUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

ministerio de economía, industria y competitividad, gobierno de españa CGL2017-83843-C2-1-P
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Floaters constitute the sexually mature but non-breeding part of populations. Despite being ubiquitous in most species, knowledge about floaters is scarce. Ignoring this significant number of individuals may strongly bias our understanding of population dynamics and sexual selection processes. We used the spotless starling (Sturnus unicolor) to examine whether phenotypical and non-phenotypical variables from early and adult life predict reproductive status, focusing on the earliest age at which most individuals start to breed, when the percentage of floaters is the highest. We compiled data from a long-term study involving eight female and seven male cohorts of individuals PIT-tagged at birth. We compared a suite of nestling (condition, hatching date and brood size) and adult variables (condition, size and ornamentation) between floaters and breeders. We found that adult and nestling body condition strongly and positively influenced the likelihood of breeding in males. Path analysis revealed that male reproductive status could only be predicted by considering nestling body condition-the influence of this variable superseded adult body condition. Female reproductive status was only negatively associated with hatching date. Ornamentation was not associated with reproductive status in any of the sexes, although path analyses revealed that body condition was positively associated with throat feather length. We conclude that predictors of reproductive status are sex-specific in the spotless starling, suggesting an important role of body condition in access to breeding resources in males. Our results also highlight the long-term influence of early life on life trajectories and their potential implications on floating status.

Indexed as

ReproductionStarlingsAnimalsBreedingFeathersFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleSexual Behavior, AnimalEarly-conditionsFloatingNonbreedersReproductive-statusStarling

Identifiers

PMID35554681
PMCPMC9119866
OpenAlexW4280600646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.