ArticlePediatric radiology2022
Ultrasound findings of acute pancreatitis in children.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility and utilization of transabdominal ultrasound in pediatric patients with acute recurrent or chronic pancreatitis.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2026Article
- Pancreas volumes in pediatric patients following index acute pancreatitis and acute recurrent pancreatitis.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2024Article
- Consensus Minimum MRI Protocol for the Child With Acute Recurrent or Chronic Pancreatitis.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudies systematically documenting US findings in children with acute pancreatitis are limited. Pancreas duct dilation is described as the most reliable finding of acute pancreatitis but this has not been rigorously examined in children.
objectiveTo systematically document US findings in children with acute pancreatitis and to define interobserver agreement on those findings. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this cross-sectional study we retrospectively reviewed images for all pediatric patients <18 years of age who had been prospectively enrolled in a registry of patients with index admissions for acute pancreatitis between March 2013 and July 2020. Two blinded observers (R1, R2) reviewed the first transabdominal US examination performed within 2 weeks of the pancreatitis attack for each patient.
resultsIn 141 children, US was performed at a median of 1 day (interquartile range [IQR]: 0, 1) following acute attack. Thirty-three (23%, R1) and 38 (27%, R2) children had no abnormal findings on US. Peripancreatic edema was the most frequent finding documented by both reviewers (63% R1, 54% R2). The pancreatic duct was visible in only 35% of the children and was dilated in only 12% (R1) and 14% (R2). There was substantial to almost-perfect agreement between reviewers on findings of acute pancreatitis (κ=0.62-1), including duct visibility.
conclusionPeripancreatic edema was the most frequently identified finding in children with acute pancreatitis, present in up to 63%, with almost perfect interobserver agreement. Duct dilation, cited in the literature as a reliable finding of acute pancreatitis, was rarely identified in our sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.