ArticleHuman molecular genetics2022
Polygenic risk scores for prediction of breast cancer risk in women of African ancestry: a cross-ancestry approach.
Article in Human molecular genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating breast cancer polygenic risk scores at scale in the WISDOM Study: a national randomized personalized screening trial.Genome medicine · 2025Trial
- Polygenic Risk Scores for Breast Cancer Among African American Women With High Risk.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Improved polygenic risk prediction models for breast cancer subtypes in women of African ancestry.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Genetic and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Estimation.JAMA network open · 2025Observational
- Review
- Evaluation of Multiple Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Panels in Women of Latin American Heritage.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025Article
- Alcohol Consumption Does not Modify the Polygenic Risk Score-Based Genetic Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association analyses of breast cancer in women of African ancestry identify new susceptibility loci and improve risk prediction.Nature genetics · 2024Article
- Polygenic risk scores, radiation treatment exposures and subsequent cancer risk in childhood cancer survivors.Nature medicine · 2024Article
- Integrating a Polygenic Risk Score into a clinical setting would impact risk predictions in familial breast cancer.Journal of medical genetics · 2024Article
- Addition of polygenic risk score to a risk calculator for prediction of breast cancer in US Black women.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Review
- An apparent quandary: adoption of polygenics and gene panels for personalised breast cancer risk stratification.BJC reports · 2023Review
- A scoping review of smoking cessation pharmacogenetic studies to advance future research across racial, ethnic, and ancestral populations.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
57 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are useful for predicting breast cancer risk, but the prediction accuracy of existing PRSs in women of African ancestry (AA) remains relatively low. We aim to develop optimal PRSs for the prediction of overall and estrogen receptor (ER) subtype-specific breast cancer risk in AA women. The AA dataset comprised 9235 cases and 10 184 controls from four genome-wide association study (GWAS) consortia and a GWAS study in Ghana. We randomly divided samples into training and validation sets. We built PRSs using individual-level AA data by a forward stepwise logistic regression and then developed joint PRSs that combined (1) the PRSs built in the AA training dataset and (2) a 313-variant PRS previously developed in women of European ancestry. PRSs were evaluated in the AA validation set. For overall breast cancer, the odds ratio per standard deviation of the joint PRS in the validation set was 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-1.42] with the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.581. Compared with women with average risk (40th-60th PRS percentile), women in the top decile of the PRS had a 1.98-fold increased risk (95% CI: 1.63-2.39). For PRSs of ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer, the AUCs were 0.608 and 0.576, respectively. Compared with existing methods, the proposed joint PRSs can improve prediction of breast cancer risk in AA women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.