Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35553629›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2022

Seroconversion following COVID-19 vaccination: can we optimize protective response in CD20-treated individuals?

David Baker, Amy MacDougall, Angray S Kang, Klaus Schmierer, Gavin Giovannoni, Ruth Dobson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. COVID-19 infection and vaccination in immunodeficiency.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David BakerThe Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Amy MacDougallMedical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Angray S KangThe Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Klaus SchmiererThe Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-8893
Gavin GiovannoniThe Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ruth DobsonClinical Board Medicine (Neuroscience), The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Queen Mary University of London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although there is an ever-increasing number of disease-modifying treatments for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), few appear to influence coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity. There is concern about the use of anti-CD20-depleting monoclonal antibodies, due to the apparent increased risk of severe disease following severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus two (SARS-CoV-2) infection and inhibition of protective anti-COVID-19 vaccine responses. These antibodies are given as maintenance infusions/injections and cause persistent depletion of CD20+ B cells, notably memory B-cell populations that may be instrumental in the control of relapsing MS. However, they also continuously deplete immature and mature/naïve B cells that form the precursors for infection-protective antibody responses, thus blunting vaccine responses. Seroconversion and maintained SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels provide protection from COVID-19. However, it is evident that poor seroconversion occurs in the majority of individuals following initial and booster COVID-19 vaccinations, based on standard 6 monthly dosing intervals. Seroconversion may be optimized in the anti-CD20-treated population by vaccinating prior to treatment onset or using extended/delayed interval dosing (3-6 month extension to dosing interval) in those established on therapy, with B-cell monitoring until (1-3%) B-cell repopulation occurs prior to vaccination. Some people will take more than a year to replete and therefore protection may depend on either the vaccine-induced T-cell responses that typically occur or may require prophylactic, or rapid post-infection therapeutic, antibody or small-molecule antiviral treatment to optimize protection against COVID-19. Further studies are warranted to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such approaches and whether or not immunity wanes prematurely as has been observed in the other populations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Multiple SclerosisAntibodies, ViralAntigens, CD20COVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2SeroconversionVaccinationAntibodies, ViralAntigens, CD20COVID-19 VaccinesautoimmunityCD20 B cellsCOVID-19 vaccinationimmunotherapymultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID35553629
PMCPMC9113152
OpenAlexW4206672099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.