Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35553043›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of dermatology2022

Efficacy and safety of N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO gel in patients with moderate-to severe facial acne vulgaris: a phase IIb randomized double-blind, vehicle-controlled trial.

Mauro Picardo, Carla Cardinali, Michelangelo La Placa, Anita Lewartowska-Białek, Viviana Lora, Giuseppe Micali, Roberta Montisci, Luca Morbelli, Andrea Nova, Aurora Parodi and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The antibacterial activity of berberine againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Mauro PicardoCutaneous Physiopathology and Integrated Center of Metabolomics Research, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4899-6639
Carla CardinaliHospital S. Stefano di Prato, Prato, Italy.
Michelangelo La PlacaUniversity Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, U.O. Dermatology, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6894-3350
Anita Lewartowska-BiałekCentrum Medyczne Angelius Provita, Katowice, Poland.
Viviana LoraCutaneous Physiopathology and Integrated Center of Metabolomics Research, San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe MicaliP.O. Rodolico (University Hospital Vittorio Emanuele), U.O.C. Dermatology, Catania, Italy.
Roberta MontisciHippocrates-Research, Genova, Italy.
Luca MorbelliEthical GmbH, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea NovaValos, Genova, Basel, Switzerland.
Aurora ParodiUniversity Hospital San Martino, U.O. Dermatology, Genova, Italy.
Adam ReichDepartment of Dermatology, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5573-1754
Michael SebastianDermatologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Scholz, Sebastian, Schilling, Blankenfelde-Mahlow, Germany.
Katarzyna Turek-UrasińskaLaser Clinic s.c. Andrzej Królicki, Tomasz Kochanowski, Szczecin, Poland.
Oliver WeirichRosenpark Research GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany.
Jacek ZdybskiDermedic Jacek Zdybski, Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, Poland.
Christos C ZouboulisDepartments of Dermatology, Venereology, Allergology and Immunology Dessau Medical Center Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane and Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Dessau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-2608
GEDACNE Study Group
San Gallicano Hospital · ITAkademii Nauk Stosowanych im. Józefa Gołuchowskiego · PLAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico - Vittorio Emanuele · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · ITMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane · DEOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITPraxis für Humangenetik · DERosenpark Klinik · DEUniversity of Rzeszów · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreliminary in vitro and in vivo studies have supported the efficacy of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) modulator N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO (NAC-GED) for the treatment of acne-inducing sebocyte differentiation, improving sebum composition and controlling the inflammatory process.

objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of NAC-GED (5% and 2%) in patients with moderate-to-severe facial acne vulgaris.

methodsThis double-blind phase II randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at 36 sites in Germany, Italy and Poland. Patients aged 12-30 years with facial acne, an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3-4, and an inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion count of 20-100 were randomized to topical application of the study drug (2% or 5%) or placebo (vehicle), once daily for 12 weeks. The co-primary efficacy endpoints were percentage change from baseline in total lesion count (TLC) and IGA success at week 12; the safety endpoints were adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. This study was registered with EudraCT (2018-003307-19).

resultsBetween Q1 in 2019 and Q1 in 2020 450 patients [n = 418 (92·9%) IGA 3; n = 32 (7·1%) IGA 4] were randomly assigned to NAC-GED 5% (n = 150), NAC-GED 2% (n = 150) or vehicle (n = 150). The percentage change in TLC reduction was statistically significantly higher in both the NAC-GED 5% [-57·1%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -60·8 to -53·4; P < 0·001] and NAC-GED 2% (-44·7%, 95% CI -49·1 to -40·1; P < 0·001) groups compared with vehicle (-33·9%, 95% CI -37·6 to -30·2). A higher proportion of patients treated with NAC-GED 5% experienced IGA success (45%, 95% CI 38-53) vs. the vehicle group (24%, 95% CI 18-31; P < 0·001). The IGA success rate was 33% in the NAC-GED 2% group (P = not significant vs. vehicle). The percentage of patients who had one or more AEs was 19%, 16% and 19% in the NAC-GED 5%, NAC-GED 2% and vehicle groups, respectively.

conclusionsThe topical application of NAC-GED 5% reduced TLC, increased the IGA success rate and was safe for use in patients with acne vulgaris. Thus, NAC-GED, a new PPARγ modulator, showed an effective clinical response. What is already known about this topic? Acne vulgaris, one of the most common dermatological diseases, affects more than 85% of adolescents. There is a medical need for innovative and safe treatment of acne vulgaris. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is involved in lipid metabolism and specifically in cell differentiation, sebum production and the inflammatory reaction. What does this study add? N-acetyl-GED-0507-34-LEVO (NAC-GED 5%), a PPARγ modulator, significantly improves acne manifestations in patients with moderate-to-severe acne and is safe and well tolerated. The results suggest that the PPARγ receptor is a novel therapeutic target for acne. The results provide a basis for a large phase III trial to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of NAC-GED in combating a disease that afflicts 80-90% of adolescents.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisPPAR gammaAdolescentDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunoglobulin APropionatesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeGED-0507Immunoglobulin APPAR gammaPropionates

Identifiers

PMID35553043
PMCPMC9796277
OpenAlexW4280503545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.