ArticlePharmaceutical research2022
Development and Use of an Ex-Vivo In-Vivo Correlation to Predict Antiepileptic Drug Clearance in Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Anakinra Removal by Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: An Ex Vivo Analysis.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesResults from previous ex-vivo continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) models have successfully demonstrated similar extraction coefficients (EC) identified from in-vivo clinical trials. The objectives of this study are to develop an ex-vivo in-vivo correlation (EVIVC) model to predict drug clearance for commonly used antiepileptics and to evaluate similarity in drug extraction across different CRRT modalities to extrapolate dosing recommendations.
methodsLevetiracetam, lacosamide, and phenytoin CRRT clearance was evaluated using the Prismaflex CRRT system and M150 hemodiafilters using an albumin containing normal saline (ALB-NS) vehicle with 3 different albumin concentrations (2 g/dL, 3 g/dL, and 4 g/dL) and a human plasma vehicle at 3 different effluent flow rates (1 L/hr, 2 L/hr, and 3 L/hr). Blood and effluent/dialysate concentrations were collected after circuit priming. ECs were calculated for each drug, modality, vehicle, and experimental arm combination.
resultsThe calculated average EC for levetiracetam and lacosamide was approximated to the fraction unbound from plasma protein. Human plasma and ALB-NS vehicles demonstrated adequate prediction of in-vivo CRRT clearance. Geometric mean ratios indicated similarity in extraction coefficients when comparing between hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration modalities and between filtration and dialysis modalities at effluent flow rates ≤ 2L/hr. Evaluation of phenytoin provided inconsistent findings with regards to extraction coefficient similarity across different CRRT modalities.
conclusionThe findings indicate that an ex-vivo study can be used as a surrogate to predict in-vivo levetiracetam and lacosamide clearance in patients receiving CRRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35552966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.