Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552947›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2022

Fabrication on the microscale: a two-photon polymerized device for oocyte microinjection.

Suliman H Yagoub, Jeremy G Thompson, Antony Orth, Kishan Dholakia, Brant C Gibson, Kylie R Dunning

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Suliman H YagoubAustralian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (CNBP), Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1855-6627
Jeremy G ThompsonAustralian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (CNBP), Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4941-7731
Antony OrthNational Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5937-6254
Kishan DholakiaSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, Scotland, KY16 9SS.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6534-9009
Brant C GibsonAustralian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (CNBP), Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-2796
Kylie R DunningAustralian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (CNBP), Adelaide, South Australia, 5000, Australia. kylie.dunning@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-6479
Australian Research Council · AUNational Research Council Canada · CAUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, Australian Research Council CE140100003Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/P030017/1Hospital Research Foundation C-MCF-58-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) addresses male sub-fertility by injecting a spermatozoon into the oocyte. This challenging procedure requires the use of dual micromanipulators, with success influenced by inter-operator expertise. We hypothesized that minimizing oocyte handling during ICSI will simplify the procedure. To address this, we designed and fabricated a micrometer scale device that houses the oocyte and requires only one micromanipulator for microinjection.

methodsThe device consisted of 2 components, each of sub-cubic millimeter volume: a Pod and a Garage. These were fabricated using 2-photon polymerization. Toxicity was evaluated by culturing single-mouse presumptive zygotes (PZs) to the blastocyst stage within a Pod, with several Pods (and embryos) docked in a Garage. The development was compared to standard culture. The level of DNA damage/repair in resultant blastocysts was quantified (γH2A.X immunohistochemistry). To demonstrate the capability to carry out ICSI within the device, PZs were microinjected with 4-μm fluorescent microspheres and cultured to the blastocyst stage. Finally, the device was assessed for oocyte traceability and high-throughput microinjection capabilities and compared to standard microinjection practice using key parameters (pipette setup, holding then injecting oocytes).

resultsCompared to standard culture, embryo culture within Pods and a Garage showed no differences in development to the blastocyst stage or levels of DNA damage in resultant blastocysts. Furthermore, microinjection within our device removes the need for a holding pipette, improves traceability, and facilitates high-throughput microinjection.

conclusionThis novel device could improve embryo production following ICSI by simplifying the procedure and thus decreasing inter-operator variability.

Indexed as

OocytesSemenAnimalsBlastocystMaleMiceMicroinjectionsPolymerizationSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic3D fabricationARTHigh-throughput microinjectionICSIInfertilityIVF

Identifiers

PMID35552947
PMCPMC9365896
OpenAlexW4280558767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.