Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552788›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2022

Comparison of 8 versus 15 days of antibiotic therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial.

Adrien Bouglé, Sophie Tuffet, Laura Federici, Marc Leone, Antoine Monsel, Thomas Dessalle, Julien Amour, Claire Dahyot-Fizelier, François Barbier, Charles-Edouard Luyt and 14 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Candent issues in pneumonia. Reflections from the Fifth Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2023.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 3 countries.

Adrien BougléDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiology Institute, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France. adrien.bougle@aphp.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8990-4705
Sophie TuffetDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology-Clinical Research Platform, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Laura FedericiService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Corbeil, France.
Marc LeoneService d'anesthésie et de réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Antoine MonselMultidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesioloy and Critical Care, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Thomas DessalleDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiology Institute, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Julien AmourDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Cardiology Institute, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Claire Dahyot-FizelierDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
François BarbierService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, 14, avenue de l'Hôpital, 45100, Orléans, France.
Charles-Edouard LuytMedical Intensive Care Unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Olivier LangeronMultidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesioloy and Critical Care, Sorbonne University, GRC 29, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
Bernard CholleyDépartement d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France.
Julien PottecherAnaesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, Strasbourg University Hospital-EA3072, FMTS, Strasbourg, France.
Tarik HissemGeneral Intensive Care Unit, Sud-Essonne Hospital, Étampes, France.
Jean-Yves LefrantService des Réanimations, Pôle Anesthésie Réanimation Douleur Urgence, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Benoit VeberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Perioperative Medicine, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.
Matthieu LegrandDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care and Burn Unit, Groupe Hospitalier Lariboisière-Saint Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
Alexandre DemouleService de Médecine Intensive Et Réanimation (Département R3S), APHP-Sorbonne Université, Site Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Pierre KalfonService de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Louis Pasteur, CH de Chartres, Chartres, France.
Jean-Michel ConstantinDepartment of Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Alexandra RousseauDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology-Clinical Research Platform, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Tabassome SimonDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology-Clinical Research Platform, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Arnaud FoucrierDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Beaujon Hospital, DMU Parabol, AP-HP Nord, Université de Paris, Clichy, France.
iDIAPASON Trial Investigators
Sorbonne Université · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre Hospitalier Sud Francilien · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRLes Hôpitaux de Chartres · FRAix-Marseille Université · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRPatients First · USUniversité de Strasbourg · FRCentre Hospitalier Sud-Essonne Dourdan-Etampes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen · FRCentre hospitalier universitaire d'Orléans · FRHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FR

Funding

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris P140923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDuration of antibiotic therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the non-inferiority of a short duration of antibiotics (8 days) vs. prolonged antibiotic therapy (15 days) in VAP due to PA (PA-VAP).

methodsWe conducted a nationwide, randomized, open-labeled, multicenter, non-inferiority trial to evaluate optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in PA-VAP. Eligible patients were adults with diagnosis of PA-VAP and randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to receive a short-duration treatment (8 days) or a long-duration treatment (15 days). A pre-specified analysis was used to assess a composite endpoint combining mortality and PA-VAP recurrence rate during hospitalization in the intensive care unit (ICU) within 90 days.

resultsThe study was stopped after 24 months due to slow inclusion rate. In intention-to-treat population (n = 186), the percentage of patients who reached the composite endpoint was 25.5% (N = 25/98) in the 15-day group versus 35.2% (N = 31/88) in the 8-day group (difference 9.7%, 90% confidence interval (CI) -1.9%-21.2%). The percentage of recurrence of PA-VAP during the ICU stay was 9.2% in the 15-day group versus 17% in the 8-day group. The two groups had similar median days of mechanical ventilation, of ICU stay, number of extra pulmonary infections and acquisition of multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens during ICU stay.

conclusionsOur study failed to show the non-inferiority of a short duration of antibiotics in the treatment of PA-VAP, compared to a long duration. The short duration strategy may be associated to an increase of PA-VAP recurrence. However, the lack of power limits the interpretation of this study.

Indexed as

Pneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansIntensive Care UnitsPseudomonas aeruginosaRespiration, ArtificialAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic therapyPseudomonas aeruginosaRecurrenceSurvivalVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID35552788
OpenAlexW4280632258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.