Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552622›Full record

ReviewClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

A Road Map for Designing Phase I Clinical Trials of Radiotherapy-Novel Agent Combinations.

Sarah R Brown, Samantha Hinsley, Emma Hall, Chris Hurt, Richard D Baird, Martin Forster, Andrew F Scarsbrook, Richard A Adams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah R BrownLeeds Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7975-7537
Samantha HinsleyClinical Trials Unit Glasgow, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6903-4688
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5999-5020
Chris HurtCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1206-8355
Richard D BairdCancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-6483
Martin ForsterUniversity College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew F ScarsbrookRadiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4243-032X
Richard A AdamsCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University and Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3915-7243

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25350Cancer Research UK 25355Cancer Research UK 25447Cancer Research UK 28832Cancer Research UK C19942/A28832Cancer Research UK C7852/A25447Department of Health BRC-1215–20014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiotherapy has proven efficacy in a wide range of cancers. There is growing interest in evaluating radiotherapy-novel agent combinations and a drive to initiate this earlier in the clinical development of the novel agent, where the scientific rationale and preclinical evidence for a radiotherapy combination approach are high. Optimal design, delivery, and interpretation of studies are essential. In particular, the design of phase I studies to determine safety and dosing is critical to an efficient development strategy. There is significant interest in early-phase research among scientific and clinical communities over recent years, at a time when the scrutiny of the trial methodology has significantly increased. To enhance trial design, optimize safety, and promote efficient trial conduct, this position paper reviews the current phase I trial design landscape. Key design characteristics extracted from 37 methodology papers were used to define a road map and a design selection process for phase I radiotherapy-novel agent trials. Design selection is based on single- or dual-therapy dose escalation, dose-limiting toxicity categorization, maximum tolerated dose determination, subgroup evaluation, software availability, and design performance. Fifteen of the 37 designs were identified as being immediately accessible and relevant to radiotherapy-novel agent phase I trials. Applied examples of using the road map are presented. Developing these studies is intensive, highlighting the need for funding and statistical input early in the trial development to ensure appropriate design and implementation from the outset. The application of this road map will improve the design of phase I radiotherapy-novel agent combination trials, enabling a more efficient development pathway.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansMaximum Tolerated DoseResearch DesignSoftware

Identifiers

PMID35552622
PMCPMC9433953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.