Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552532›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2022

Evaluation of the changes in physical properties and mineral content of enamel exposed to radiation after treating with remineralization agent.

Merve Pelin Dur, Neslihan Celik, Nilgun Seven

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Merve Pelin DurDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey. mervedur_2@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-5694
Neslihan CelikDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Nilgun SevenDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ataturk University, 25240, Erzurum, Turkey.
Atatürk University · TR

Funding

Atatürk Üniversitesi TDH-2019-7260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different remineralization agents on the physical properties and elemental content of enamel exposed to radiation. MATERIAL AND

methodThe enamel surfaces of impacted third molar teeth were prepared, and six study groups were created (n = 6). Next, 60 Gy radiation was applied to each group. Between applications, each group except for the control group was treated with a different remineralization agent (sodium fluoride, casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP), casein phosphopeptide amorphous calcium phosphate with fluorite (CPP-ACFP), bioactive glass, or chitosan). The results were evaluated in terms of pre- and post-radiation values and the difference between the two. The paired-samples t test and analysis of variance test were used in the analysis of normally distributed hardness and roughness values, while Wilcoxon's signed ranks test, and the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used in the analysis of elemental content without normal distribution.

resultsA statistically significant decrease was observed in microhardness measurements in all groups. Intragroup evaluation revealed a statistically significant difference between the NaF and bioactive glass groups (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups' roughness measurements (p < 0.05). Intergroup evaluation of surface roughness revealed a significant difference in the CPP-ACFP and chitosan groups (p < 0.05). Pre- and post-radiation oxygen, magnesium, and potassium levels and Ca/P ratios also differed significantly (p < 0.05).

conclusionRadiation caused a statistically significant difference in the microhardness and elemental content of enamel. However, no significant difference was observed in enamel roughness. The applied remineralizing agents have a partial ameliorating effect on the adverse impacts of radiation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Radiation causes changes in the mechanical properties and elemental content of tooth enamel. Remineralizing agent application is a promising option in reducing the adverse effects of irradiation.

Indexed as

CaseinsChitosanCalcium PhosphatesDental EnamelHumansMineralsPhosphopeptidesSodium FluorideTooth Remineralizationamorphous calcium phosphateCalcium PhosphatesCaseinsChitosanMineralsPhosphopeptidesSodium FluorideChitosanMicrohardnessRadiotherapyRemineralizationSEM–EDXSurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID35552532
OpenAlexW4280568093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.