Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552476›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A ultrasound-based radiomic approach to predict the nodal status in clinically negative breast cancer patients.

Samantha Bove, Maria Colomba Comes, Vito Lorusso, Cristian Cristofaro, Vittorio Didonna, Gianluca Gatta, Francesco Giotta, Daniele La Forgia, Agnese Latorre, Maria Irene Pastena and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha Bove *Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Maria Colomba Comes *Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Vito LorussoUnità Operativa Complessa Di Oncologia Medica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Cristian CristofaroStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Vittorio DidonnaStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Gianluca GattaDipartimento Di Medicina Di Precisione, Università Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131, Napoli, Italy.
Francesco GiottaUnità Operativa Complessa Di Oncologia Medica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Daniele La ForgiaStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Radiologia Senologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy. d.laforgia@oncologico.bari.it.
Agnese LatorreUnità Operativa Complessa Di Oncologia Medica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Maria Irene PastenaUnità Operativa Complessa Di Anatomia Patologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Nicole PetruzzellisStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Domenico PomaricoStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy. domenico.pomarico@hotmail.it.
Lucia RinaldiStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Oncologia Per La Presa in Carico Globale del Paziente, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Pasquale TamborraStruttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Alfredo ZitoUnità Operativa Complessa Di Anatomia Patologica, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Annarita Fanizzi *Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Raffaella Massafra *Struttura Semplice Dipartimentale Di Fisica Sanitaria, I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Istituto Tumori Bari · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In breast cancer patients, an accurate detection of the axillary lymph node metastasis status is essential for reducing distant metastasis occurrence probabilities. In case of patients resulted negative at both clinical and instrumental examination, the nodal status is commonly evaluated performing the sentinel lymph-node biopsy, that is a time-consuming and expensive intraoperative procedure for the sentinel lymph-node (SLN) status assessment. The aim of this study was to predict the nodal status of 142 clinically negative breast cancer patients by means of both clinical and radiomic features extracted from primary breast tumor ultrasound images acquired at diagnosis. First, different regions of interest (ROIs) were segmented and a radiomic analysis was performed on each ROI. Then, clinical and radiomic features were evaluated separately developing two different machine learning models based on an SVM classifier. Finally, their predictive power was estimated jointly implementing a soft voting technique. The experimental results showed that the model obtained by combining clinical and radiomic features provided the best performances, achieving an AUC value of 88.6%, an accuracy of 82.1%, a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 78.2%. The proposed model represents a promising non-invasive procedure for the SLN status prediction in clinically negative patients.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAxillaFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesSentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Identifiers

PMID35552476
PMCPMC9098914
OpenAlexW4280545198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.