Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552450›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2022

Systemic Therapies Following Progression on First-line CDK4/6-inhibitor Treatment: Analysis of Real-world Data.

James M Martin, Elizabeth A Handorf, Alberto J Montero, Lori J Goldstein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06882499 (Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06882499 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) With Maintenance of Systemic Therapy Versus Physicians' Choice of Systemic Therapy for Oligoprogressive ER-positive, Her-2 Negative Breast Cancer II

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, AustraliaRan2026 to 2032Enrolled74ConditionsBreast Cancer, Metastatic, Metastatic Breast CancerArmsStereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy, Physician's choice of systemic treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Economic value of ribociclib in early breast cancer in the United States.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James M MartinUniversity Hospitals/Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1909-8370
Elizabeth A HandorfFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-8978
Alberto J MonteroUniversity Hospitals/Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lori J GoldsteinFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (Her2-) breast cancer remains a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. First-line treatment with endocrine therapy (ET) with a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) has largely become the standard systemic therapy. Following progression, no prospective randomized data exist to help guide second-line treatment. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study used a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database, specifically analyzing 1210 patients with HR+/Her2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who were treated in the first-line setting with a CDK4/6i from the years 2015-2020. The aim of this study was to assess what therapies were given after first-line progression on CDK4/6i and to observe treatment patterns over time. Determination of second-line treatment efficacy, specifically assessing real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) was performed.

resultsA total of 839 patients received a documented second-line therapy after progression on first-line CDK4/6i treatment. Chemotherapy was chosen for 29.7% of patients, and the use of chemotherapy decreased over time. Three hundred two (36.0%) of patients continued a CDK4/6i. Data were adjusted for age, race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, stage at breast cancer diagnosis, and insurance payer type. Continuation of the CDK4/6i was associated with improved rwPFS (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.43-0.53, P < .0001) and OS (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.26-0.35, P < .0001) compared to chemotherapy. A majority of these patients continued the same CDK4/6i in the second-line setting, as was given in the first-line setting.

conclusionWhile prospective data are needed, analysis of real-world data suggests a survival benefit for continuation of a CDK4/6i beyond frontline progression for patients with HR+/Her2- MBC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansProspective StudiesCDK4 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsabemaciclibCDK4/6 inhibitoreverolimuspalbociclibribociclib

Identifiers

PMID35552450
PMCPMC9177121
OpenAlexW4221116477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.