Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552443›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A mechanical and simplified model for RC elements subjected to combined shear and axial tension.

A Deifalla, F M Mukhtar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A DeifallaDepartment of Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo City, 11835, Egypt. ahmed.deifalla@fue.edu.eg.
F M MukhtarDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Very little is known about the shear behavior of elements, in particular those subjected to axial tension. The shear accompanied by tensile forces could cause premature failure of reinforced concrete, which is sudden with minimal warning. Therefore, understanding the shear behavior of reinforced concrete (RC) elements, including those subjected to axial tension, is an ultimate goal of the worldwide research community. In the current study, a new shear mechanical model for RC elements subjected to axial tension is developed, which makes physical sense and explains the behavior. The model is strain-based, inspired by the critical crack theory model (CSCT). In addition, the proposed model extended CSCT (ECSCT) quantifies the effect of axial tension forces on the shear strength in terms of reduction in the compression zone depth and increase in the longitudinal strain. Moreover, the nonlinear trend observed in the literature was implemented using nonlinear multi-variable regression. The ECSCT is validated and compared with available design methods with respect to an extensive database, including 180 elements tested under shear and tension from 18 different research investigations. The ECSCT provided an accurate and physically sound model yet safe to an acceptable extent. Last but not least, a simplified model for the purpose of design is proposed. The simplified model was chosen based on the mechanical model and calibrated using the extensive experimental database. The simplified model provided an accurate and simple model, yet safe to an acceptable extent.

Identifiers

PMID35552443
PMCPMC9098529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.