Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35552364›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2022

Treatment With Etirinotecan Pegol for Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases: Final Results From the Phase 3 ATTAIN Randomized Clinical Trial.

Debu Tripathy, Sara M Tolaney, Andrew D Seidman, Carey K Anders, Nuhad Ibrahim, Hope S Rugo, Chris Twelves, Véronique Diéras, Volkmar Müller, Yining Du and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02915744 (A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of NKTR-102 Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02915744 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Study of NKTR-102 Versus Treatment of Physician's Choice (TPC) in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Who Have Stable Brain Metastases and Have Been Previously Treated With an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine

TypeinterventionalSponsorNektar TherapeuticsRan2016 to 2020Enrolled178ConditionsMetastasis, Breast CancerArmsNKTR-102, Eribulin, Ixabepilone, Vinorelbine, Gemcitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Targeting Breast Cancer: An Overlook on Current Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Debu TripathyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Sara M TolaneyDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew D SeidmanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Carey K AndersDuke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Nuhad IbrahimThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Hope S RugoUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Chris TwelvesUniversity of Leeds and Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, England.
Véronique DiérasCentre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Volkmar MüllerUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Yining DuNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Sue L CurrieNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Ute HochNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Mary TagliaferriNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Alison L HannahNektar Therapeutics, San Francisco, California.
Javier CortésInternational Breast Cancer Center, Quironsalud Group, Barcelona, Spain.
ATTAIN Investigators
Nektar Therapeutics (United States) · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCentre Eugène Marquis · FRDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USDuke Medical Center · USHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Women's Cancer Research ProgramP30CA014236 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Laura Fish · 1985 to 2026
$174.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014236NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with breast cancer and brain metastases (BM) have a poor prognosis and high clinical need for novel treatments; however, historically, studies have often excluded these patients. Although the BEACON study did not meet its primary end point, treatment with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician's choice for patients with advanced breast cancer demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) for the prespecified patient subgroup with preexisting, pretreated, and nonprogressive BM. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in patients with BM treated with etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy of the physician's choice in a confirmatory trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a phase 3, open-label, randomized clinical trial (ATTAIN) in patients with metastatic breast cancer and a history of stable pretreated BM who experienced disease progression while receiving chemotherapy in the metastatic setting. The trial took place at 47 sites in 10 countries, and patients were enrolled between March 7, 2017, and November 6, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive etirinotecan pegol, 145 mg/m2, every 21 days or chemotherapy (eribulin, ixabepilone, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, or nab-paclitaxel). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was OS. Key secondary end points included progression-free survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and the clinical benefit rate. Results: A total of 178 female patients (9 [5.1%] Asian, 8 [4.5%] Black or African American, and 123 [69.1] White individuals) were randomized to receive treatment with etirinotecan pegol (92 [51.7%]; median [range] age, 53 [27-79] years) or chemotherapy (86 [48.3%]; median [range] age, 52 [24-77] years). Median OS was similar in both groups (etirinotecan pegol, 7.8 months; chemotherapy, 7.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% CI, 0.61-1.33; P = .60). Median progression-free survival for non-central nervous system metastases per blinded independent central review for etirinotecan pegol vs chemotherapy was 2.8 and 1.9 months (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.16; P = .18) and 3.9 vs 3.3 months, respectively, for central nervous system metastases (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.33-1.05; P = .07). Safety profiles between the groups were largely comparable. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of the ATTAIN randomized clinical trial found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between treatment with etirinotecan pegol and chemotherapy in patients with BM. However, this study represents one of the largest published trials dedicated to patients with breast cancer and BM and may help to inform further research. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02915744.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHumansMiddle AgedPolyethylene Glycolsetirinotecan pegolHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID35552364
PMCPMC9100460
OpenAlexW4280527227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.