ArticleNeuroImage2022
Using deep clustering to improve fMRI dynamic functional connectivity analysis.
Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Machine Learning Prediction Model for In-Hospital Mortality in Postoperative Patients With Type A Aortic Dissection.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- An Orthogonal Semi-Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Method for Dynamic Functional Connectivity Analysis and Its Application to Schizophrenia.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026Article
- Study of the brain function characteristics in children with cerebral palsy during walking using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- A Statistical Characterization of Dynamic Brain Functional Connectivity.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- The changes in brain network functional gradients and dynamic functional connectivity in SeLECTS patients revealing disruptive and compensatory mechanisms in brain networks.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Resting-state functional connectivity in children cooled for neonatal encephalopathy.Brain communications · 2024Article
- A predictor-informed multi-subject bayesian approach for dynamic functional connectivity.PloS one · 2024Article
- Variations on the theme: focus on cerebellum and emotional processing.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) analysis of resting-state fMRI data is commonly performed by calculating sliding-window correlations (SWC), followed by k-means clustering in order to assign each window to a given state. Studies using synthetic data have shown that k-means performance is highly dependent on sliding window parameters and signal-to-noise ratio. Additionally, sources of heterogeneity between subjects may affect the accuracy of group-level clustering, thus affecting measurements of dFC state temporal properties such as dwell time and fractional occupancy. This may result in spurious conclusions regarding differences between groups (e.g. when comparing a clinical population to healthy controls). Therefore, is it important to quantify the ability of k-means to estimate dFC state temporal properties when applied to cohorts of multiple subjects, and to explore ways in which clustering performance can be maximised. Here, we explore the use of dimensionality reduction methods prior to clustering in order to map high-dimensional data to a lower dimensional space, providing salient features to the subsequent clustering step. We assess the use of deep autoencoders for dimensionality reduction prior to applying k-means clustering to the encoded data. We compare this deep clustering method to dimensionality reduction using principle component analysis (PCA), uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP), as well as applying k-means to the original feature space using either L1 or L2 distance. We provide extensive quantitative evaluation of clustering performance using synthetic datasets, representing data from multiple heterogeneous subjects. In synthetic data we find that deep clustering gives the best performance, while other approaches are often insufficient to capture temporal properties of dFC states. We then demonstrate the application of each method to real-world data from human subjects and show that the choice of dimensionality reduction method has a significant effect on group-level measurements of state temporal properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.