Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551631›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2022

MEdical Database AnaLysIS of Japanese multiple myeloma patienTs with apheresis #2 (MEDALIST-2): the impact of plerixafor use on costs and healthcare resources during mobilization and stem cell transplantation.

Shinsuke Iida, Tadao Ishida, Toshihiro Miyamoto, Satoshi Teramukai, Heigoroh Shirai, Rie Kanamori, Yuki Tajima, Bruce Crawford, Jingbo Yi, Takanori Teshima

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Shinsuke IidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya City University Institute of Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Tadao IshidaDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshihiro MiyamotoDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Satoshi TeramukaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Heigoroh ShiraiSanofi K. K., Tokyo, Japan.
Rie KanamoriSanofi K. K., Tokyo, Japan.
Yuki TajimaSanofi K. K., Tokyo, Japan.
Bruce CrawfordSyneos Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Jingbo YiSyneos Health, Tokyo, Japan.
Takanori TeshimaDepartment of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan. teshima@med.hokudai.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0941-271X
Sanofi (Japan) · JPHokkaido University of Science · JPJapanese Red Cross Medical Center · JPKanazawa University · JPKyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNagoya City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment for multiple myeloma (MM) can involve apheresis to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for later autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), which can become costly over time. This retrospective claims database study examined healthcare resource use and medical costs associated with plerixafor, a selective CXCR4 inhibitor that mobilizes hematopoietic stem cells and minimizes apheresis times. Medical data were sampled from Japanese MM patients between April 2017 and September 2019, after the Japanese launch of plerixafor. The study population (190 plerixafor users and 180 non-users) was identified from the Medical Data Vision database, and further stratified into those using granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in monotherapy or in combination with cyclophosphamide to trigger apheresis. A descriptive comparison of patient characteristics, healthcare resource use, and medical costs across the mobilization and ASCT phases indicated plerixafor is associated with higher average total medical costs. However, plerixafor-treated patients received fewer concomitant medications and spent less time in apheresis than non-users. A comparison of non-users with a similar analysis conducted pre-plerixafor launch (2013-2017) showed general improvements to treatment independent of plerixafor. The results of this research can inform guidelines for the role of plerixafor in balancing cost-effectiveness and drug efficacy in MM treatment.

Indexed as

BenzylaminesBlood Component RemovalCyclamsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple MyelomaCost-Benefit AnalysisDelivery of Health CareGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHumansJapanRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousBenzylaminesCyclamsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorplerixaforAutologous stem cell transplantHealthcare resource useMedical costMultiple myelomaPlerixafor

Identifiers

PMID35551631
OpenAlexW4280576768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.