Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2022
Clinical and biochemical endpoints and predictors of response to plasma exchange in septic shock: results from a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective, Randomized, Single-center, Open-label, Parallel-group Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange as an Adjunctive Strategy Against Early Septic Shock - Effect on Hemodynamics and Biochemical Markers
Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Controlled, Parallel-group Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Add-on Plasma Exchange As an Adjunctive Strategy Against Septic Shock - 2
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach From the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Tenth Special Issue.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Guideline
- Influence of therapeutic plasma exchange treatment on short-term mortality of critically ill adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Dosing of anti-infective drugs in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange - considerations for practical application: a narrative review.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Review
- Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) at ICU admission as early biomarker of intestinal injury and predictor of mortality in septic shock.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Article
- Endothelial Biomarkers Predict Clinical Deterioration in Acute Pancreatitis.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2026Article
- The Global Impact of Sepsis: Epidemiology, Recognition, Management, and Health System Challenges.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on acquired hypocholesterolemia in patients with septic shock: a post hoc analysis of the two exchange trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- Perioperative Profiling of a Disintegrin and Metalloprotease with Thrombospondin Type 1 Motif, Member 13 (ADAMTS13) Activity in Cardiac Surgery: Kinetics and Mechanistic Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Severe malnutrition during pregnancy complicated with acute pyelonephritis causing sepsis, refractory septic shock and multiple organ failure: A case report].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025Article
- The effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on the inflammatory response in septic shock: a secondary analysis of the EXCHANGE-1 trial.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- A few words of caution on blood purification in sepsis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Thrombocytopenia in Critically Ill Children: A Review for Practicing Clinicians.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Plasmapheresis for refractory toxic epidermal necrolysis unresponsive to conventional therapy: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Macrophage activation syndrome in Sepsis: from pathogenesis to clinical management.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024Review
- Plasma exchange in septic shock: are we ready for prime time? PRO.Intensive care medicine · 2024Article
- Effect of therapeutic plasma exchange on tissue factor and tissue factor pathway inhibitor in septic shock.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Enhancing Survival in Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Plasma Exchange Therapy.Cureus · 2024Review
- Septic Hyperinflammation-Is There a Role for Extracorporeal Blood Purification Techniques?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecently, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated rapid but individually variable hemodynamic improvement with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in patients with septic shock. Prediction of clinical efficacy in specific sepsis treatments is fundamental for individualized sepsis therapy.
methodsIn the original RCT, patients with septic shock of < 24 h duration and norepinephrine (NE) requirement ≥ 0.4 μg/kg/min received standard of care (SOC) or SOC + one single TPE. Here, we report all clinical and biological endpoints of this study. Multivariate mixed-effects modeling of NE reduction was performed to investigate characteristics that could be associated with clinical response to TPE.
resultsA continuous effect of TPE on the reduction in NE doses over the initial 24 h was observed (SOC group: estimated NE dose reduction of 0.005 µg/kg/min per hour; TPE group: 0.018 µg/kg/min per hour, p = 0.004). Similarly, under TPE, serum lactate levels, continuously decreased over the initial 24 h in the TPE group, whereas lactate levels increased under SOC (p = 0.001). A reduction in biomarkers and disease mediators (such as PCT (p = 0.037), vWF:Ag (p < 0.001), Angpt-2 (p = 0.009), sTie-2 (p = 0.005)) along with a repletion of exhausted protective factors (such as AT-III (p = 0.026), Protein C (p = 0.012), ADAMTS-13 (p = 0.008)) could be observed in the TPE but not in the SOC group. In a multivariate mixed effects model, increasing baseline lactate levels led to greater NE dose reduction effects with TPE as opposed to SOC (p = 0.004).
conclusionsAdjunctive TPE is associated with the removal of injurious mediators and repletion of consumed protective factors altogether leading to preserved hemodynamic stabilization in refractory septic shock. We identified that baseline lactate concentration as a potential response predictor might guide future designing of large RCTs that will further evaluate TPE with regard to hard endpoints. Trial registration Retrospectively registered 18th January 2020 at clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04231994 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.