ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2022
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of intravenously administered nanoformulated substances.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Liposomal Drug Delivery through Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.Current drug metabolism · 2025Article
- Advances in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Nanomaterials.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- REFINE special issue.Drug delivery and translational research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of nanobiomaterials (NBMs) is becoming increasingly popular in the field of medicine. To improve the understanding on the biodistribution of NBMs, the present study aimed to implement and parametrize a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. This model was used to describe the biodistribution of two NBMs after intravenous administration in rats, namely, poly(alkyl cyanoacrylate) (PACA) loaded with cabazitaxel (PACA-Cbz), and LipImage™ 815. A Bayesian parameter estimation approach was applied to parametrize the PBPK model using the biodistribution data. Parametrization was performed for two distinct dose groups of PACA-Cbz. Furthermore, parametrizations were performed three distinct dose groups of LipImage™ 815, resulting in a total of five different parametrizations. The results of this study indicate that the PBPK model can be adequately parametrized using biodistribution data. The PBPK parameters estimated for PACA-Cbz, specifically the vascular permeability, the partition coefficient, and the renal clearance rate, substantially differed from those of LipImage™ 815. This emphasizes the presence of kinetic differences between the different formulations and substances and the need of tailoring the parametrization of PBPK models to the NBMs of interest. The kinetic parameters estimated in this study may help to establish a foundation for a more comprehensive database on NBM-specific kinetic information, which is a first, necessary step towards predictive biodistribution modeling. This effort should be supported by the development of robust in vitro methods to quantify kinetic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.