Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551558›Full record

ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2025

Deep learning-based insights on T:R ratio behaviour during prolonged screening for S-ICD eligibility.

Mohamed ElRefai, Mohamed Abouelasaad, Benedict M Wiles, Anthony J Dunn, Stefano Coniglio, Alain B Zemkoho, Paul R Roberts

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed ElRefaiCardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK. Mohammedelrefai@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-1940
Mohamed AbouelasaadCardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Benedict M WilesCardiology Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Anthony J DunnSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Stefano ConiglioSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alain B ZemkohoSchool of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul R RobertsCardiac Rhythm Management Research Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major predictor of eligibility of subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators (S-ICD) is the T:R ratio. The eligibility cut-off of the T:R ratio incorporates a safety margin to accommodate for fluctuations of ECG signal amplitudes. We introduce a deep learning-based tool that accurately measures the degree of T:R ratio fluctuations and explore its role in S-ICD screening.

methodsPatients were fitted with Holters for 24 h to record their S-ICD vectors. Our tool was used to assess the T:R ratio over the duration of the recordings. Multiple T:R ratio cut-off values were applied, identifying patients at high risk of T-wave oversensing (TWO) at each of the proposed values. The purpose of our study is to identify the ratio that recognises patients at high risk of TWO while not inappropriately excluding true S-ICD candidates.

resultsThirty-seven patients (age 54.5 + / - 21.3 years, 64.8% male) were recruited. Fourteen patients had heart-failure, 7 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 7 had normal hearts, 6 had congenital heart disease, and 3 had prior inappropriate S-ICD shocks due to TWO. 54% of patients passed the screening at a T: R of 1:3. All patients passed the screening at a T: R of 1:1. The only subgroup to wholly pass the screening utilising all the proposed ratios are the participants with normal hearts.

conclusionWe propose adopting prolonged screening to select patients eligible for S-ICD with low probability of TWO and inappropriate shocks. The appropriate T:R ratio likely lies between 1:3 and 1:1. Further studies are required to identify the optimal screening thresholds.

Indexed as

Death, Sudden, CardiacDeep LearningDefibrillators, ImplantableElectrocardiography, AmbulatoryEligibility DeterminationAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentArtificial intelligenceCardiac devicesDeep learning methodsSubcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillator

Identifiers

PMID35551558
PMCPMC12436566
OpenAlexW4280587348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.