Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551533›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2022

Vaginal hormone-free moisturising cream is not inferior to an estriol cream for treating symptoms of vulvovaginal atrophy: Prospective, randomised study.

Susana Garcia de Arriba, Lisa Grüntkemeier, Manuel Häuser, Theodor W May, Clarissa Masur, Petra Stute

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Susana Garcia de ArribaDr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4935-8989
Lisa GrüntkemeierDr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Manuel HäuserDr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Theodor W MaySociety for Biometrics and Psychometrics GbR, Bielefeld, Germany.
Clarissa MasurDr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel, Bielefeld, Germany.
Petra StuteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Inselspital University Clinic of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dr. August Wolff (Germany) · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This prospective, open-label, multicentre, multinational, randomised trial investigated the non-inferiority of treatment with a vaginal hormone-free moisturising cream compared to a vaginal estriol (0.1%) cream in a panel of post-menopausal women suffering from symptoms of vulvovaginal dryness in a parallel group design. In total, 172 post-menopausal women were randomly allocated to either one of the two treatments, each administered for 43 days. The primary endpoint was the total severity score of subjective symptoms (dryness, itching, burning and pain unrelated to sexual intercourse) of the respective treatment period. Secondary endpoints were severity of single subjective symptoms (including dyspareunia if sexually active), impairment of daily life, Vaginal Health Index, as well as assessment of safety. In both groups, women treated with hormone-free moisturising cream and those treated with estriol cream, total severity score improved significantly compared to baseline by 5.0 (from 6.1 to 1.1) and by 5.4 (from 6.0 to 0.6), respectively, after 43 days of treatment (p < 0.0001). One-sided test of baseline differences (for a clinically relevant difference Δ = 1.5) confirmed the hormone-free moisturising cream to be non-inferior to the estriol cream. Severity of dyspareunia as well as impairment of daily life due to subjective symptoms, significantly improved for both treatment groups (p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis of women with mild or moderate impairment of daily life at baseline caused by "vaginal dryness" symptoms benefited from both creams, while women with severe impairment showed a significantly greater benefit from the estriol cream (p = 0.0032). Both treatments were well tolerated with no serious adverse events occurring. This study provides clinical evidence that a hormone-free vaginal moisturising cream cannot only improve vaginal dryness compared to an 0.1% estriol cream but also can relieve dyspareunia as well as improve woman's impairment of daily life, justifying its use as a first choice for mild or moderate vulvovaginal dryness symptoms.

Indexed as

DyspareuniaVaginal DiseasesAdministration, IntravaginalAtrophyEstriolFemaleHumansPostmenopauseProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVaginaVaginal Creams, Foams, and JelliesEstriolVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID35551533
PMCPMC9098008
OpenAlexW4280525146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.