Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551520›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Evaluation of a multi-species Protein A-ELISA assay for plague serologic diagnosis in humans and other mammal hosts.

Matheus Filgueira Bezerra, Camila Cavalcanti Xavier, Alzira Maria Paiva de Almeida, Christian Robson de Souza Reis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matheus Filgueira BezerraDepartamento de Microbiologia - Instituto Aggeu Magalhães; FIOCRUZ -PE. Recife, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7102-6804
Camila Cavalcanti XavierDepartamento de Microbiologia - Instituto Aggeu Magalhães; FIOCRUZ -PE. Recife, Brazil.
Alzira Maria Paiva de AlmeidaDepartamento de Microbiologia - Instituto Aggeu Magalhães; FIOCRUZ -PE. Recife, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-3182
Christian Robson de Souza ReisDepartamento de Microbiologia - Instituto Aggeu Magalhães; FIOCRUZ -PE. Recife, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3665-5669
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Hemagglutination assay (HA) is widely used in plague diagnosis, however, it has a subjective interpretation and demands high amounts of antigen and other immunobiological supplies. On the other hand, the conventional Anti-IgG ELISA is limited by the need of specific conjugates for multiple plague hosts, which leaves a gap for new diagnostic methods able to cover both the diagnosis of human cases and the epidemiological surveillance of multiple sentinel species.

methodsWe developed an ELISA Protein A-peroxidase method to detect anti-F1 antibodies across several species, including humans. To determine the cut-off and performance rates, HA results from 288 samples (81 rabbits, 64 humans, 66 rodents and 77 dogs) were used as reference. Next, we evaluated the agreement between Protein A-ELISA and Anti-IgG ELISA in an expanded sample set (n = 487).

resultsOptimal conditions were found with 250ng/well of F1 and 1:500 serum dilution. Protein A-ELISA showed high repeatability and reproducibility. We observed good correlation rates between the Protein A and IgG ELISAs optical densities and a higher positive/negative OD ratio for the Protein A-ELISA method. The overall sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve for Protein A-ELISA were 94%, 99% and 0.99, respectively. Similar results were observed for each species separately. In the analysis of the expanded sample set, there was a strong agreement between Protein A and IgG assays (kappa = 0.97). Furthermore, there was no cross-reaction with other common infectious diseases, such as dengue, Zika, Chagas disease, tuberculosis (humans) and ehrlichiosis, anaplasmosis and leishmaniasis (dogs).

conclusionsAltogether, the Protein A-ELISA showed high performance when compared both to HA and Anti-IgG ELISA, with a polyvalent single protocol that requires reduced amounts of antigen and can be employed to any plague hosts.

Indexed as

PlagueAnimalsDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansImmunoglobulin GRabbitsReproducibility of ResultsRodentiaSensitivity and SpecificityStaphylococcal Protein AZika VirusZika Virus InfectionImmunoglobulin GStaphylococcal Protein A

Identifiers

PMID35551520
PMCPMC9129028
OpenAlexW4280588116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.