Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551485›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Design and validation of a semi-automatic bone segmentation algorithm from MRI to improve research efficiency.

Lauren N Heckelman, Brian J Soher, Charles E Spritzer, Brian D Lewis, Louis E DeFrate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient-specific scaphoid prosthesis: surgical technique.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Article
  5. Influence of running on femoroacetabular joint bone-to-bone distances.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Impact of bone and cartilage segmentation from CT and MRI on both bone forearm osteotomy planning.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren N HeckelmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3093, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Brian J SoherDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Charles E SpritzerDepartment of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Brian D LewisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3093, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Louis E DeFrateDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, DUMC Box 3093, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. lou.defrate@duke.edu.

Funding

In Vivo Knee Motion and ACL Biomechanics During Dynamic ActivitiesR01AR065527 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2014 to 2024
$4.8M
Mechanical Biomarkers of Chronic Low Back PainR01AR075399 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Louis E. DeFrate, Adam Goode · 2019 to 2026
$3.7M
Biomechanical and Biological Predictors of Cartilage Health Following Meniscus InjuryR01AR079184 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E., GOODE, ADAM · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Weight loss, in vivo cartilage mechanics, and joint healthR01AR074800 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFRATE, LOUIS E. · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS AR074800NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065527NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074800NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR075399NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR079184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Segmentation of medical images into different tissue types is essential for many advancements in orthopaedic research; however, manual segmentation techniques can be time- and cost-prohibitive. The purpose of this work was to develop a semi-automatic segmentation algorithm that leverages gradients in spatial intensity to isolate the patella bone from magnetic resonance (MR) images of the knee that does not require a training set. The developed algorithm was validated in a sample of four human participants (in vivo) and three porcine stifle joints (ex vivo) using both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). We assessed the repeatability (expressed as mean ± standard deviation) of the semi-automatic segmentation technique on: (1) the same MRI scan twice (Dice similarity coefficient = 0.988 ± 0.002; surface distance = - 0.01 ± 0.001 mm), (2) the scan/re-scan repeatability of the segmentation technique (surface distance = - 0.02 ± 0.03 mm), (3) how the semi-automatic segmentation technique compared to manual MRI segmentation (surface distance = - 0.02 ± 0.08 mm), and (4) how the semi-automatic segmentation technique compared when applied to both MRI and CT images of the same specimens (surface distance = - 0.02 ± 0.06 mm). Mean surface distances perpendicular to the cartilage surface were computed between pairs of patellar bone models. Critically, the semi-automatic segmentation algorithm developed in this work reduced segmentation time by approximately 75%. This method is promising for improving research throughput and potentially for use in generating training data for deep learning algorithms.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansKnee JointSwineTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35551485
PMCPMC9098419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.