Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551318›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Female and male partner perspectives on placebo Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPTs) used by women in the TRIO study in South Africa and Kenya.

Laura Danielle Wagner, Alexandra M Minnis, Jaclyn Shea, Kawango Agot, Khatija Ahmed, Ariane van der Straten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Laura Danielle WagnerWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3417-491X
Alexandra M MinnisWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jaclyn SheaYouth + Tech + Health, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Kawango AgotImpact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya.
Khatija AhmedSetshaba Research Centre, Soshanguve, South Africa.
Ariane van der StratenASTRA Consulting, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
RTI International · USAtmospheric and Space Technology Research Associates (United States) · USImpact Research and Development Organization · KESetshaba Research Centre · ZAYouth+Tech+Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMale partner awareness and acceptance of microbicide and family planning product use has been shown to increase women's own acceptance and adherence of a product. However, little is known about preferences regarding potential Multipurpose Prevention Technology (MPT) product delivery forms. As part of the TRIO study, men's reactions to their female partner's TRIO product use and comparisons of men's and women's views of TRIO product attributes and use acceptability were explored to better understand product preferences.

methodsWomen in TRIO used three placebo products that represented potential MPTs: daily oral tablets, monthly vaginal rings, and monthly dual injections. Male partners (N = 39) and women (N = 88) completed in-depth interviews on their own and their partner's experiences with these products. Qualitative coding and analyses followed a conceptual model of HIV prevention product acceptability, and here, we explored themes of disclosure, trust and infidelity as they informed barriers and facilitators to product use.

resultsMen expressed a desire to know of their partner's product use decisions and be informed and educated on the products to better support their partners, in some cases, expressing a high level of concern regarding maximizing the ease of product adherence for their partner. They also wanted to understand the effects of products on sexual encounters with their partner, but in some cases, wanted more knowledge in order to control their partner's product use decisions. Similarly to women, men found long-acting, discreet products that have little to no effect on sexual encounters or libido the most acceptable for their female partners' use. Product use was most acceptable to men if they were informed of use without inadvertent discovery.

conclusionsMen's product attribute preferences often aligned with women's opinions of the same products. To support women's correct use of MPTs, further research is needed to determine the best strategy for achieving male partner acceptance and support of product use, particularly for less familiar delivery forms, such as the vaginal ring.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Devices, FemaleHIV InfectionsFemaleHumansKenyaMaleSexual PartnersSouth AfricaTechnology

Identifiers

PMID35551318
PMCPMC9097999
OpenAlexW4280555187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.