Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551268›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Inequalities in COVID-19 inequalities research: Who had the capacity to respond?

Joan Benach, Lucinda Cash-Gibson, Diego F Rojas-Gualdrón, Álvaro Padilla-Pozo, Juan Fernández-Gracia, Víctor M Eguíluz, COVID-SHINE group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joan BenachResearch Group on Health Inequalities, Environment and Employment Conditions (GREDS-EMCONET), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Lucinda Cash-GibsonResearch Group on Health Inequalities, Environment and Employment Conditions (GREDS-EMCONET), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3292-5684
Diego F Rojas-GualdrónFaculty of Medicine, CES University, Medellín, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-2293-0431
Álvaro Padilla-PozoResearch Group on Health Inequalities, Environment and Employment Conditions (GREDS-EMCONET), Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2110-5309
Juan Fernández-GraciaInstitute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems, Campus Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9728-7666
Víctor M EguíluzInstitute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems, Campus Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1133-1289
COVID-SHINE group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has been testing countries' capacities and scientific preparedness to actively respond and collaborate on a common global threat. It has also heightened awareness of the urgent need to empirically describe and analyze health inequalities to be able to act effectively. In turn, this raises several important questions that need answering: What is known about the rapidly emerging COVID-19 inequalities research field? Which countries and world regions have been able to rapidly produce research on this topic? What research patterns and trends have emerged, and how to these compared to the (pre-COVID-19) global health inequalities research field? Which countries have been scientifically collaborating on this important topic? Where are the scientific knowledge gaps, and indirectly where might research capacities need to be strengthened? In order to answer these queries, we analyzed the global scientific production (2020-2021) on COVID-19 associated inequalities by conducting bibliometric and network analyses using the Scopus database. Specifically, we analyzed the volume of scientific production per country (via author affiliations), its distribution by country income groups and world regions, as well as the inter-country collaborations within this production. Our results indicate that the COVID-19 inequalities research field has been highly collaborative; however, a number of significant inequitable research practices exist. When compared to the (pre-COVID-19) global health inequalities research field, similar inequalities were identified, however, several new dynamics and partnerships have also emerged that warrant further in-depth exploration. To ensure preparedness for future crises, and effective strategies to tackle growing social inequalities in health, investment in global health inequalities research capacities must be a priority for all.

Indexed as

COVID-19BibliometricsGlobal HealthHumansPandemicsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID35551268
PMCPMC9098009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.