ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2023
Real-world use of MRI for risk stratification prior to prostate biopsy.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Residents and Consultants Have Equal Outcomes When Performing Transrectal Fusion Biopsies: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Trial
- Adoption of MRI-guided Prostate Cancer Diagnostics and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Multicenter Registry Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Trends in the Adoption of MRI Associated Biopsy for Active Surveillance Within the First Year After Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A SEER-Medicare Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Increasing and more consistent use of pre-biopsy MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: insights from a population-based study in the Netherlands.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Prostate MRI and clinicopathologic risk calculator to predict laterality of extraprostatic extension at radical prostatectomy.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- MRI Utilization Rates for Veterans at Risk of Prostate Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Prostate magnetic resonance imaging to predict grade concordance, extra prostatic extension, and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Urologic oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning based on automated 3D radiomics features to classify prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Clinical assessment of urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 in Chinese population: a large-scale, prospective and multicenter study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy of localized prostate cancer: stratified by magnetic resonance imaging and risk classification.Prostate international · 2024Article
- Utility of dynamic contrast enhancement for clinically significant prostate cancer detection.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Review
- Serum free prostate-specific antigen density (fPSAD) as a predictor of prostate cancer: a new parameter worthy of attention.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
- Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Risk Calculators to Predict Prostate Cancer Risk.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Role of Perilesional Sampling of Patients Undergoing Fusion Prostate Biopsies.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Biomarkers of Aggressive Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe utilization of MRI to risk stratify elevated PSA prior to prostate biopsy has been inconsistently adopted and varies considerably by practice setting. This study aims to evaluate the usage and performance of MRI as an advanced risk stratification tool of elevated PSA prior to biopsy and identify factors associated with differential utilization of MRI at a large academic setting with ready access to 3T multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
methodsA retrospective single-center study of 2900 men presenting with elevated PSA 2-20 ng/mL from 2018 through 2021 was conducted. We analyzed trends in MRI utilization and outcomes of prostate biopsy by MRI usage. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed to calculate odds ratios to identify patient- and provider-level predictors of MRI usage.
resultsRates of prebiopsy MRI utilization increased from 56% in 2018 to 89% in 2021 (p < 0.001). Prebiopsy MRI led to biopsy avoidance in 31% of men. MRI usage enhanced detection of clinically significant prostate cancer by 13% and reduced identification of Gleason Grade Group 1 disease by 3% and negative biopsies by 10% (p < 0.001). Men who received MRI were more likely to be younger than 75 years in age and have private or Medicare insurance, PSA >4 ng/mL, and PHI >27. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, black race and Medicaid insurance were associated with reduced MRI utilization (all p < 0.001). Urologic provider was an independent predictor of MRI usage (p < 0.001).
conclusionsUse of MRI as a risk stratification tool for elevated PSA rose during this 4-year study period. Men who self-identify as black or men with Medicaid coverage have diminished rates of MRI usage. Considerable provider-level variability in MRI use was observed. Future research aimed at identifying factors affecting implementation of MRI as a routine risk assessment tool is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.