ArticleScientific reports2022
Biomechanical comparison of the femoral neck system and the dynamic hip screw in basicervical femoral neck fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative efficacy and safety of three internal fixation strategies for femoral neck fractures: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A meta-analysis comparing the effects of cemented and uncemented prostheses on wound infection and pain in patients with femoral neck fractures.International wound journal · 2023Pooled it
- Femoral neck system versus cannulated screws combined with medial plate for femoral neck fractures in young and middle-aged patients: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Trial
- A comparative study on the clinical efficacy and complications of proximal femoral nail antirotation and femoral neck system in the treatment of basicervical femoral neck fracture (AO/OTA 31-B3).Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- Biomechanical study of medial buttress plate combined with cannulated compression screws for pauwels type III femoral neck fractures using formalin-fixed human cadaveric femora.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Does FNS outperform CCS in Pauwel's type III fracture fixation: a combined experimental and numerical study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Femoral Neck System Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures in Patients Aged 60-70 Years: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Hip Function.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Failure of the Femoral Neck System in a Young Patient: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Fatigue testing of a self-compression screw model in Pauwels III fracture: an in vitro analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2025Article
- Is DHS with Fibular Strut Graft Superior for the Fixation of Comminuted Femoral Neck Fractures (FNF)? A Comparative Analysis with New Implant Femoral Neck System.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Computational evaluation of the biomechanical effects of position changes in the femoral neck system on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: an in silico study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Two-year outcomes of internal fixation with femoral neck system in patients with femoral neck fracture in an Asian population.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Biomechanical comparison of femoral neck anti-rotation and support system versus femoral neck system for unstable pauwels III femoral neck fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- A recent update on the fixation techniques for femoral neck fractures: A narrative review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- A finite element analysis of a low-profile femoral neck system of screws in sleeves in a vertical femoral neck fracture model.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Femoral Neck System (FNS) and Cannulated Screw Fixation in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Study.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2024Article
- Bio-mechanical effects of femoral neck system versus cannulated screws on treating young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Fixation of femoral neck fracture with femoral neck system: a retrospective cohort study of 43 patients.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- [Early effectiveness of Ti-Robot assisted femoral neck system for minimally invasive treatment of elderly Garden type Ⅱ and Ⅲ femoral neck fractures].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023Article
- Characteristics and Treatment Strategies for Basicervical and Transcervical Shear Fractures of the Femoral Neck.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the fixation stability of proximal fragments and the mechanical characteristics in proximal femur models of basicervical femoral neck fracture fixed by the femoral neck system (FNS) versus the dynamic hip screw. The mean axial stiffness was 234 ± 35 N/mm in the FNS group and 253 ± 42 N/mm in the DHS group, showing no significant difference (p = 0.654). Mean values for x-axis rotation, y-axis rotation, and z-axis rotation after cycle load were 2.2 ± 0.5°, 6.5 ± 1.5°, and 2.5 ± 0.6°, respectively, in the FNS group and 2.5 ± 0.7°, 5.8 ± 2.1°, and 2.2 ± 0.9°, respectively, in the DHS group, showing no significant differences (p = 0.324, p = 0.245, and p = 0.312, respectively). The mean values of cranial and axial migration of screws within the femoral head were 1.5 ± 0.3 and 2.1 ± 0.2 mm, respectively, in the FNS group and 1.2 ± 0.3 and 2.4 ± 0.3 mm, respectively, in the DHS group, showing no significant differences (p = 0.425 and p = 0.625, respectively). The average failure load at vertical load was 1342 ± 201 N in the FNS group and 1450 ± 196 N in the DHS group, showing no significant difference (p = 0.452). FNS fixation might provide biomechanical stability comparable to that of DHS for treating displaced basicervical femoral neck fractures in young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.