Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551185›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Large differences in carbohydrate degradation and transport potential among lichen fungal symbionts.

Philipp Resl, Adina R Bujold, Gulnara Tagirdzhanova, Peter Meidl, Sandra Freire Rallo, Mieko Kono, Samantha Fernández-Brime, Hörður Guðmundsson, Ólafur Sigmar Andrésson, Lucia Muggia and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The chloroplast genome of theFrontiers in genetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 8 countries.

Philipp ReslUniversity of Graz, Institute of Biology, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7841-6060
Adina R BujoldUniversity of Alberta, Biological Sciences CW405, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-5899
Gulnara TagirdzhanovaUniversity of Alberta, Biological Sciences CW405, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8493-2387
Peter MeidlLudwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Faculty of Biology Department 1, Diversity and Evolution of Plants, Menzingerstraße 67, 80638, Munich, Germany.
Sandra Freire RalloRey Juan Carlos University, Departamento de Biología y Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, Móstoles, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1576-0507
Mieko KonoSwedish Museum of Natural History, Botany Department, PO Box 50007, SE10405, Stockholm, Sweden.
Samantha Fernández-BrimeSwedish Museum of Natural History, Botany Department, PO Box 50007, SE10405, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3846-5033
Hörður GuðmundssonFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 102, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0003-0731-3141
Ólafur Sigmar AndréssonFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 102, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-5671
Lucia MuggiaUniversity of Trieste, Department of Life Sciences, via L. Giorgieri 10, 34127, Trieste, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0390-6169
Helmut MayrhoferUniversity of Graz, Institute of Biology, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010, Graz, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9433-3847
John P McCutcheonDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA.
Mats WedinSwedish Museum of Natural History, Botany Department, PO Box 50007, SE10405, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8295-5198
Silke WerthLudwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Faculty of Biology Department 1, Diversity and Evolution of Plants, Menzingerstraße 67, 80638, Munich, Germany.
Lisa M WillisUniversity of Alberta, Biological Sciences CW405, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6204-033X
Toby SpribilleUniversity of Alberta, Biological Sciences CW405, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada. toby.spribille@ualberta.ca.
University of Alberta · CASwedish Museum of Natural History · SELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Graz · ATUniversity of Iceland · ISArizona State University · USUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lichen symbioses are thought to be stabilized by the transfer of fixed carbon from a photosynthesizing symbiont to a fungus. In other fungal symbioses, carbohydrate subsidies correlate with reductions in plant cell wall-degrading enzymes, but whether this is true of lichen fungal symbionts (LFSs) is unknown. Here, we predict genes encoding carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) and sugar transporters in 46 genomes from the Lecanoromycetes, the largest extant clade of LFSs. All LFSs possess a robust CAZyme arsenal including enzymes acting on cellulose and hemicellulose, confirmed by experimental assays. However, the number of genes and predicted functions of CAZymes vary widely, with some fungal symbionts possessing arsenals on par with well-known saprotrophic fungi. These results suggest that stable fungal association with a phototroph does not in itself result in fungal CAZyme loss, and lends support to long-standing hypotheses that some lichens may augment fixed CO

Indexed as

AscomycotaLichensCarbohydrate MetabolismCarbonCelluloseCarbonCellulose

Identifiers

PMID35551185
PMCPMC9098629
OpenAlexW4280522918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.