Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551080›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

'It's the empathy'-defining a role for peer support among people living with chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study.

Meghan J Elliott, Shannan Love, Danielle E Fox, Nancy Verdin, Maoliosa Donald, Kate Manns, David Cunningham, Jill Goth, Brenda R Hemmelgarn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The impact of "nurse-led education" vs. "nurse-led education plus peer support" on patients' decision for peritoneal dialysis treatment in chronic kidney disease patients.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Meghan J ElliottDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada meghan.elliott@albertahealthservices.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5434-2917
Shannan LoveDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Danielle E FoxDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nancy VerdinSouthern Alberta Branch, The Kidney Foundation of Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Maoliosa DonaldDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Kate MannsDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
David CunninghamSouthern Alberta Branch, The Kidney Foundation of Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jill GothSouthern Alberta Branch, The Kidney Foundation of Canada, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Brenda R HemmelgarnDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAKidney Foundation of Canada · CAAlberta Health Services · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPersons with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) have unique support needs associated with managing a chronic yet often silent condition, complex treatment-related decisions and care transitions. The aim of this study was to explore perspectives on how peer support could address CKD support needs and augment care.

designThis study employed a qualitative descriptive methodology. Data were collected through focus groups (cofacilitated by patient partners) and semistructured interviews.

settingFour multidisciplinary CKD clinics across Southern Alberta, Canada.

participantsWe purposively sampled among adult patients with advanced, non-dialysis CKD and their caregivers, as well as trained peer mentors from The Kidney Foundation of Canada's Kidney Connect programme. ANALYSIS: Transcripts were coded in duplicate, and themes were generated inductively through a thematic analysis approach.

resultsWe conducted seven focus groups with a total of 39 patient and caregiver participants. Seven patients and caregivers who were unable to attend a focus group and 13 peer mentors participated in a telephone interview. Although patients and caregivers had limited awareness of peer support, participants acknowledged its central role in affirming their experiences and enabling confidence to live well with kidney disease. We identified four themes related to the anticipated role of peer support in addressing support needs for people with non-dialysis CKD: (1) creating connection; (2) preparing for uncertainty; (3) adapting to new realities; and (4) responsive peer support delivery. Aligning peer support access with patient readiness and existing CKD management supports can promote optimism, community and pragmatic adaptations to challenges.

conclusionsPatients, caregivers and peer mentors highlighted a unique value in the shared experiences of CKD peers to anticipate and manage disease-related challenges and confidently face a future living with kidney disease.

Indexed as

EmpathyRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultAlbertaCaregiversFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Researchchronic kidney diseasepatient engagementpeer supportqualitative researchsupport needs

Identifiers

PMID35551080
PMCPMC9109100
OpenAlexW4280609103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.