Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35551059›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Access to and Use of Mobile Phone by Postpartum, Married Women in Punjab, India: Secondary Analysis of mHealth Intervention Pilot Data.

Ruchita S Pendse, Alison M El Ayadi, Preetika Sharma, Alka Ahuja, Darshan Hosapatna Basavarajappa, Mona Duggal, Ankita Kankaria, Pushpendra Singh, Vijay Kumar, Rashmi Bagga and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mobile Phone-Based Nutrition Education Targeting Pregnant and Nursing Mothers in Sri Lanka.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruchita S PendseStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-0656
Alison M El AyadiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2674-4887
Preetika SharmaPost-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-0420
Alka AhujaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4055-4097
Darshan Hosapatna BasavarajappaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2066-1549
Mona DuggalPost-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-2871
Ankita KankariaDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4641-7333
Pushpendra SinghDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2152-1027
Vijay KumarSurvival for Women and Children Foundation, Panchkula, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5947-8349
Rashmi BaggaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2693-2343
Nadia G Diamond-SmithDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-3029
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INUniversity of California, San Francisco · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INFistulacure · INIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology Delhi · INStanford University · US

Funding

Development and Pilot Test of an mHealth Interactive Education and Social Support Intervention for Improving Postnatal HealthR21HD101786 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DIAMOND-SMITH, NADIA GRIFFI, EL AYADI, ALISON M · 2020 to 2021
$401k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD101786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs mobile phone uptake in India continues to grow, there is also continued interest in mobile platform-based interventions for health education. There is a significant gender gap in mobile phone access-women's access to mobile phones is constrained by economic and social barriers. Pregnancy and postpartum care is one of many targets for mobile health (mHealth) interventions that particularly rely upon women's access to and facility with mobile phone use.

objectiveWe aimed to describe the dynamics and patterns of married pregnant and postpartum women's mobile phone access and use (among both phone owners and nonowners) who participated in an mHealth postpartum care intervention and to identify potential barriers to their participation in mobile platform-based interventions.

methodsA secondary analysis was performed on mixed methods data obtained for a pilot mHealth intervention for postpartum care of mothers in rural Punjab from July 2020 to February 2021. Two formative sources included exploratory in-depth interviews among postpartum women (n=20; 1-3 months postpartum) and quantitative maternal health survey among women who were pregnant or who had recently given birth (n=102). We also utilized mixed methods intervention assessment data from early postpartum women who participated in the pilot intervention (n=29), including intervention moderator perspectives. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, and pertinent findings were grouped thematically.

resultsThe majority of women owned a phone (maternal health survey: 75/102, 74%; demographic survey: 17/29, 59%), though approximately half (53/102, 52%) still reported sharing phones with other family members. Sharing a phone with female family members typically allowed for better access than sharing with male family members. Some households had strict preferences against daughters-in-law having phones, or otherwise significantly restricted women's phone access. Others reported concerns about phone use-related health hazards for mother and infant during the pregnancy or postpartum period.

conclusionsThese findings suggest nuance regarding what is meant by women's phone ownership and access-there were numerous additional constraints on women's use of phones, particularly during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Future research and mHealth interventions should probe these domains to better understand the dynamics governing women's access, use, and fluency with mobile phones to optimally design mHealth interventions.

Indexed as

digital healthgenderhealth educationIndiamHealthmobile healthmobile phone usemotherspostnatal carepostpartum periodpregnancysex factorsSouth Asiatelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35551059
PMCPMC9136645
OpenAlexW4225647027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.