ArticleBMC nutrition2022
Perspectives from healthcare professionals on the nutritional adequacy of plant-based dairy alternatives: results of a mixed methods inquiry.
Article in BMC nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Rise of Plant-Based Proteins: Consumer Perception and Challenges.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Determinants of dairy products purchase decisions among polish doctors: A gender-based analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effect of Homogenization and Pectin on Chemical, Textural, Antioxidant and Sensory Characteristics ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Extrinsic Attributes That Drive Oat Milk Purchase.Journal of food science · 2025Article
- Attitudes toward milk alternatives and motives for (non-)consumption: an interview study with adolescents from Germany.BMC nutrition · 2025Article
- The role of dairy alternatives in just food system transitions: a scoping review.Agriculture and human values · 2025Review
- Factors influencing intentions to transition to plant-based protein diets: Canadian perspective.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
- Consideration of nutrition and sustainability in public definitions of 'healthy' food: an analysis of submissions to the US FDA.Public health nutrition · 2024Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of the Nutritional Composition of Plant-Based Drinks and Yogurt Alternatives in Europe.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Nutritional Composition of Plant Protein Beverages on China's Online Market: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Article
- Plant-Based Milk Alternatives in Child Nutrition.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare professionals are important sources of nutrition and health information for Americans. As plant-based (PB) dairy alternative products increase in popularity, concerns have been raised about their nutritional adequacy, and whether consumers understand nutritional differences to dairy. Healthcare professionals directly advise consumers on dietary choices, therefore we sought to examine their understanding and opinions of PB dairy alternatives.
methodsWe analyzed comments submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by health professionals (n = 191) in 2018-2019 in response to a request for public comment on the nutrition of PB dairy alternatives and the use of dairy terms like "milk", "cheese", and "yogurt" on their labels. Survey data from healthcare professionals (n = 417) was collected in 2020-2021. Comments and survey responses to open-ended questions were coded using template analysis and thematically analyzed. Logistic regression models examined perceptions across health professional characteristics for close-ended survey responses.
resultsThree-fourths of health professionals believe consumers are confused about the nutritional differences between dairy and PB dairy alternatives. Over half (53%) do not believe either product is nutritionally superior to the other. Many believe dairy products have higher nutrient value, but also believe PB dairy alternatives can be part of a healthful diet. Compared to other types of health professionals, dietetics professionals demonstrated a more accurate understanding of the nutritional value of both products and were more likely to believe nutrients like protein (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.22-3.34, p = 0.006) and vitamin D (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.48-4.09, p = 0.001) may be nutrients of concern for PB dairy alternative consumers. They were also more likely to believe consumers are confused about these products (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.65-7.21; p = 0.001). Health professionals who submitted comments to the FDA showed stronger opinions in favor of PB dairy alternatives.
conclusionsAlthough PB dairy alternatives have nutritional value in certain diets, responses from health professionals suggest that changing their labeling to be different than dairy may reduce confusion. Improved nutrition education among health professionals may also be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.