Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35550654›Full record

ArticleBMC nutrition2022

Perspectives from healthcare professionals on the nutritional adequacy of plant-based dairy alternatives: results of a mixed methods inquiry.

Bridget E Clark, Lizzy Pope, Emily H Belarmino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Plant-Based Milk Alternatives in Child Nutrition.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bridget E ClarkDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, 256 Carrigan Wing, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405-0086, USA.
Lizzy PopeDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, 256 Carrigan Wing, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405-0086, USA.
Emily H BelarminoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Vermont, 256 Carrigan Wing, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405-0086, USA. Emily.Belarmino@uvm.edu.
University of Vermont · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare professionals are important sources of nutrition and health information for Americans. As plant-based (PB) dairy alternative products increase in popularity, concerns have been raised about their nutritional adequacy, and whether consumers understand nutritional differences to dairy. Healthcare professionals directly advise consumers on dietary choices, therefore we sought to examine their understanding and opinions of PB dairy alternatives.

methodsWe analyzed comments submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by health professionals (n = 191) in 2018-2019 in response to a request for public comment on the nutrition of PB dairy alternatives and the use of dairy terms like "milk", "cheese", and "yogurt" on their labels. Survey data from healthcare professionals (n = 417) was collected in 2020-2021. Comments and survey responses to open-ended questions were coded using template analysis and thematically analyzed. Logistic regression models examined perceptions across health professional characteristics for close-ended survey responses.

resultsThree-fourths of health professionals believe consumers are confused about the nutritional differences between dairy and PB dairy alternatives. Over half (53%) do not believe either product is nutritionally superior to the other. Many believe dairy products have higher nutrient value, but also believe PB dairy alternatives can be part of a healthful diet. Compared to other types of health professionals, dietetics professionals demonstrated a more accurate understanding of the nutritional value of both products and were more likely to believe nutrients like protein (OR 2.02; 95% CI 1.22-3.34, p = 0.006) and vitamin D (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.48-4.09, p = 0.001) may be nutrients of concern for PB dairy alternative consumers. They were also more likely to believe consumers are confused about these products (OR 3.44; 95% CI 1.65-7.21; p = 0.001). Health professionals who submitted comments to the FDA showed stronger opinions in favor of PB dairy alternatives.

conclusionsAlthough PB dairy alternatives have nutritional value in certain diets, responses from health professionals suggest that changing their labeling to be different than dairy may reduce confusion. Improved nutrition education among health professionals may also be necessary.

Indexed as

DairyDairy alternativesHealth professionalsPlant-based dietsPlant-based labeling

Identifiers

PMID35550654
PMCPMC9097167
OpenAlexW4280614807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.