Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35549909›Full record

ArticleBMC urology2022

Impact of salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy on prognosis in patients with recurrence after radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Dai Koguchi, Kazumasa Matsumoto, Masaomi Ikeda, Yoshinori Taoka, Takahiro Hirayama, Yasukiyo Murakami, Takuji Utsunomiya, Daisuke Matsuda, Norihiko Okuno, Akira Irie and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dai KoguchiDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
Kazumasa MatsumotoDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan. kazumasa@cd5.so-net.ne.jp.
Masaomi IkedaDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
Yoshinori TaokaDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
Takahiro HirayamaDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasukiyo MurakamiDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Takuji UtsunomiyaDepartment of Urology, Kanagawa Prefectural Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives for Health and Welfare Sagamihara Kyodo Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Daisuke MatsudaDepartment of Urology, Higashiyamato Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Norihiko OkunoDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Akira IrieDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatsugu IwamuraDepartment of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, 1-15-1 Kitasato Minami-ku Sagamihara, Kanagawa, 252-0374, Japan.
Kitasato University · JPNational Sagamihara Hospital · JPKitasato Institute Hospital · JPKitasato University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients experiencing disease recurrence after radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer, data about the impact of clinicopathologic factors, including salvage treatment using cytotoxic chemotherapy, on the survival are scarce. We investigated the prognostic value of clinicopathologic factors and the treatment effect of salvage cytotoxic chemotherapy (SC) in such patients.

methodsIn this retrospective study, we evaluated the clinical data for 86 patients who experienced recurrence after RC. Administration of SC or of best supportive care (BSC) was determined in consultation with the urologist in charge and in accordance with each patient's performance status, wishes for treatment, and renal function. Statistical analyses explored for prognostic factors and evaluated the treatment effect of SC compared with BSC in terms of cancer-specific survival (CSS).

resultsMultivariate analyses showed that liver metastasis after RC (hazard ratio [HR] 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17 to 3.85; P = 0.01) and locally advanced disease at RC (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.46; P = 0.03) are independent risk factors for worse CSS in patients experiencing recurrence after RC. In a risk stratification model, patients were assigned to one of two groups based on liver metastasis and locally advanced stage. In the high-risk group, which included 68 patients with 1-2 risk factors, CSS was significantly better for patients receiving SC than for those receiving BSC (median survival duration: 9.4 months vs. 2.4 months, P = 0.005). The therapeutic effect of SC was not related to a history of adjuvant chemotherapy.

conclusionsThe present study indicated the potential value of 1st-line SC in patients experiencing recurrence after RC even with advanced features, such as liver metastasis after RC and locally advanced disease at RC.

Indexed as

Liver NeoplasmsUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCystectomyFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyTreatment OutcomeBladder cancerPrognosisRadical cystectomySalvage cytotoxic chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35549909
PMCPMC9103293
OpenAlexW4280498533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.