Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35549895›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2022

Introduction of loxP sites by electroporation in the mouse genome; a simple approach for conditional allele generation in complex targeting loci.

Guillaume Bernas, Mariette Ouellet, Andréa Barrios, Hélène Jamann, Catherine Larochelle, Émile Lévy, Jean-François Schmouth

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume BernasCentre de recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Mariette OuelletCentre de recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Andréa BarriosCentre de recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Hélène JamannCentre de recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Catherine LarochelleCentre de recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Émile LévyCentre de recherche du CHU Ste-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada.
Jean-François SchmouthCentre de recherche du CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada. jean-francois.schmouth.chum@ssss.gouv.qc.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8138-6707
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe discovery of the CRISPR-Cas9 system and its applicability in mammalian embryos has revolutionized the way we generate genetically engineered animal models. To date, models harbouring conditional alleles (i.e. two loxP sites flanking an exon or a critical DNA sequence of interest) are amongst the most widely requested project type that are challenging to generate as they require simultaneous cleavage of the genome using two guides in order to properly integrate the repair template. An approach, using embryo sequential electroporation has been reported in the literature to successfully introduce loxP sites on the same allele. Here, we describe a modification of this sequential electroporation procedure that demonstrated the production of conditional allele mouse models for eight different genes via one of two possible strategies: either by consecutive sequential electroporation (strategy A) or non-consecutive sequential electroporation (strategy B). This latest strategy originated from using the by-product produced when using consecutive sequential electroporation (i.e. mice with a single targeted loxP site) to complete the project.

resultsBy using strategy A, we demonstrated successful generation of conditional allele models for three different genes (Icam1, Lox, and Sar1b), with targeting efficiencies varying between 5 and 13%. By using strategy B, we generated five conditional allele models (Loxl1, Pard6a, Pard6g, Clcf1, and Mapkapk5), with targeting efficiencies varying between 3 and 25%.

conclusionOur modified electroporation-based approach, involving one of the two alternative strategies, allowed the production of conditional allele models for eight different genes via two different possible paths. This reproducible method will serve as another reliable approach in addition to other well-established methodologies in the literature for conditional allele mouse model generation.

Indexed as

ElectroporationAllelesAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsEmbryo, MammalianExonsMammalsMiceConditionalCRISPRElectroporationloxPZygotes

Identifiers

PMID35549895
PMCPMC9097428
OpenAlexW4280493960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.