ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022
Automated medical chart review for breast cancer outcomes research: a novel natural language processing extraction system.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automating chart review for identification of infected patients using natural language processing.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- A Secure, Scalable Large Language Model-Based System (CIDER) for High-Throughput Clinical Data Extraction From Medical Reports: Retrospective Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Leveraging Data Science for Conducting Observational Studies: Highlighting Advantages and Limitations Throughout the Evaluation of a Use Case.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2026Article
- A Novel Electronic Medical Record Search Method to Identify Patients With Ketosis-Prone Diabetes: Implications for Discovery of Atypical Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2026Article
- Automated extraction of temporalized tumor evolution from oncology EMRs using natural language processing.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Development and Assessment of a Pipeline for Extracting Structured Data From Free-Text Medical Reports Using a Large Language Model.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2026Article
- Development of a machine learning model for automatic data extraction from breast cancer pathology reports.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Natural language processing improves reliable identification of COVID-19 compared to diagnostic codes alone.American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- OphthoACR (Ophthalmology Automated Chart Review): An AI-Powered Tool for Complete Automation of Ophthalmology Chart Reviews and Cohort Data Analysis.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for surgical data management and decision support: lessons from wound care.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Automated Identification of Breast Cancer Relapse in Computed Tomography Reports Using Natural Language Processing.JCO clinical cancer informatics · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a novel AI framework using NLP with LLM integration for relevant clinical data extraction through automated chart review.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Health Care Language Models and Their Fine-Tuning for Information Extraction: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- BraNet: a mobil application for breast image classification based on deep learning algorithms.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- Natural Language Processing for Breast Imaging: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundManually extracted data points from health records are collated on an institutional, provincial, and national level to facilitate clinical research. However, the labour-intensive clinical chart review process puts an increasing burden on healthcare system budgets. Therefore, an automated information extraction system is needed to ensure the timeliness and scalability of research data.
methodsWe used a dataset of 100 synoptic operative and 100 pathology reports, evenly split into 50 reports in training and test sets for each report type. The training set guided our development of a Natural Language Processing (NLP) extraction pipeline system, which accepts scanned images of operative and pathology reports. The system uses a combination of rule-based and transfer learning methods to extract numeric encodings from text. We also developed visualization tools to compare the manual and automated extractions. The code for this paper was made available on GitHub.
resultsA test set of 50 operative and 50 pathology reports were used to evaluate the extraction accuracies of the NLP pipeline. Gold standard, defined as manual extraction by expert reviewers, yielded accuracies of 90.5% for operative reports and 96.0% for pathology reports, while the NLP system achieved overall 91.9% (operative) and 95.4% (pathology) accuracy. The pipeline successfully extracted outcomes data pertinent to breast cancer tumor characteristics (e.g. presence of invasive carcinoma, size, histologic type), prognostic factors (e.g. number of lymph nodes with micro-metastases and macro-metastases, pathologic stage), and treatment-related variables (e.g. margins, neo-adjuvant treatment, surgical indication) with high accuracy. Out of the 48 variables across operative and pathology codebooks, NLP yielded 43 variables with F-scores of at least 0.90; in comparison, a trained human annotator yielded 44 variables with F-scores of at least 0.90.
conclusionsThe NLP system achieves near-human-level accuracy in both operative and pathology reports using a minimal curated dataset. This system uniquely provides a robust solution for transparent, adaptable, and scalable automation of data extraction from patient health records. It may serve to advance breast cancer clinical research by facilitating collection of vast amounts of valuable health data at a population level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.