ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Urdu translation and cross-cultural validation of Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT).
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Chronic Ankle Instability and Its Management Among Ankle Sprain Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Validating Patient-Reported Outcomes and Surveys in Other Languages.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Cutoff Score Determination of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Recreationally Active Individuals.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Ankle biomechanics of the three-step layup in a basketball player with chronic ankle instability.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The effect of Tuina based on the concept of hip-knee-ankle conjugation in patients with chronic ankle instability: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is a self-assessment tool for people with chronic ankle instability (CAI). This tool had been translated and validated in many languages but there is no Urdu version of CAIT available.
objectiveThe aim was to translate the CAIT into the Urdu Language and determine its validity and reliability.
methodsA standardized step-wise forward and backward translation process was followed. Content, construct, convergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were determined. A pilot study was done on 10 patients with CAI. The final version was investigated in 120 patients (mean age 26.6 ± 4.8 yrs) with CAI for validity and test-retest reliability in which 105 participants filled the questionnaire in the second week. Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach's alpha. Intraclass correlation (ICC
resultsContent validity index was > 0.80 of each question. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's alpha > 0.75). Convergent validity with FAOS total score showed a moderate negative correlation (r = -0.68) with U-CAIT and negatively correlated with subscales of FAOS. Test-retest reliability was excellent ICC
conclusionThe Urdu version of CAIT is a valid and reliable assessment tool for patients with chronic ankle instability. It has good content validity, construct validity and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.