Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35549552›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Gaze following requires early visual experience.

Ehud Zohary, Daniel Harari, Shimon Ullman, Itay Ben-Zion, Ravid Doron, Sara Attias, Yuval Porat, Asael Y Sklar, Ayelet Mckyton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Seeing social interactions.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Gaze following requires early visual experience.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ehud ZoharyThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Daniel HarariDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4745-9292
Shimon UllmanDepartment of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 7610001, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4331-298X
Itay Ben-ZionDepartment of Ophthalmology, Padeh Medical Center, Poriya 15208, Israel.
Ravid DoronDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, Hadassah Academic College, Jerusalem 91010, Israel.
Sara AttiasThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Yuval PoratThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.
Asael Y SklarThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-2545
Ayelet MckytonNeurology Department, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILWeizmann Institute of Science · ILHadassah Academic College · ILHadassah Medical Center · ILPoriya Medical Center · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaze understanding—a suggested precursor for understanding others’ intentions—requires recovery of gaze direction from the observed person's head and eye position. This challenging computation is naturally acquired at infancy without explicit external guidance, but can it be learned later if vision is extremely poor throughout early childhood? We addressed this question by studying gaze following in Ethiopian patients with early bilateral congenital cataracts diagnosed and treated by us only at late childhood. This sight restoration provided a unique opportunity to directly address basic issues on the roles of “nature” and “nurture” in development, as it caused a selective perturbation to the natural process, eliminating some gaze-direction cues while leaving others still available. Following surgery, the patients’ visual acuity typically improved substantially, allowing discrimination of pupil position in the eye. Yet, the patients failed to show eye gaze-following effects and fixated less than controls on the eyes—two spontaneous behaviors typically seen in controls. Our model for unsupervised learning of gaze direction explains how head-based gaze following can develop under severe image blur, resembling preoperative conditions. It also suggests why, despite acquiring sufficient resolution to extract eye position, automatic eye gaze following is not established after surgery due to lack of detailed early visual experience. We suggest that visual skills acquired in infancy in an unsupervised manner will be difficult or impossible to acquire when internal guidance is no longer available, even when sufficient image resolution for the task is restored. This creates fundamental barriers to spontaneous vision recovery following prolonged deprivation in early age.

Indexed as

Fixation, OcularVision, OcularAttentionBlindnessChildHumansVisual Acuityblindcataractgazejoint attentionvision

Identifiers

PMID35549552
PMCPMC9171757
OpenAlexW4280514375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.