Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35549460›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of urology2022

A Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial Comparing Robotic-Assisted Fluoroscopic-Guided with Ultrasound-Guided Renal Access for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Kazumi Taguchi, Shuzo Hamamoto, Atsushi Okada, Teruaki Sugino, Rei Unno, Taiki Kato, Hidekatsu Fukuta, Ryosuke Ando, Noriyasu Kawai, Yung Khan Tan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. New Technology in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Application of Navigation System, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, and Suction Access Sheath.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mini ECIRS with BotX: our single-case experience.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kazumi TaguchiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-5114
Shuzo HamamotoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Atsushi OkadaDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Teruaki SuginoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Rei UnnoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Taiki KatoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Hidekatsu FukutaCore Laboratory, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryosuke AndoDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Noriyasu KawaiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Yung Khan TanUrohealth Medical Clinic, Mt Elizabeth Hospital, Novena, Singapore.
Takahiro YasuiDepartment of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
Nagoya City University · JPGTx (United States) · USMount Elizabeth Novena Hospital · SGUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe conducted a randomized, single-blind clinical trial comparing the surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted fluoroscopic-guided (RAF group) and ultrasound-guided (US group) renal access in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIALS AND

methodsWe recruited patients who underwent mini-PCNL with ureteroscopic assistance for large renal stones between January 2020 and May 2021. Block randomization was performed using online software. Automated needle target with x-ray was used for fluoroscopic-guided renal access in the RAF group. PCNL was performed by residents using a pneumatic lithotripsy system with 16.5Fr/17.5Fr tracts. The primary outcome was single puncture success, and the secondary outcomes were stone-free rate, complication rate, parameters measured during renal access and fluoroscopy time.

resultsIn total, 71 patients (35 in US group, 36 in RAF group) were enrolled. No difference was seen in the single puncture success rate between the US and RAF groups (34.3% and 50.0%, p=0.2). In 14.3% cases in the US group vs no cases in the RAF group, the resident was unable to obtain access due to difficult targeting (p=0.025). The mean number of needle punctures was significantly fewer, and the median duration of needle puncture was shorter in the RAF group (1.83 vs 2.51 times, p=0.025; 5.5 vs 8.0 minutes, p=0.049, respectively). The stone-free rate at 3 months after surgery was 83.3% and 70.6% in the RAF and US groups, respectively (p=0.26). Multivariate analysis revealed that RAF guidance reduced the mean number of needle punctures by 0.73 times (p=0.021).

conclusionsRAF renal access in mini-PCNL may have further potential applications in this field.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousNephrostomy, PercutaneousRobotic Surgical ProceduresFluoroscopyHumansSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Interventionalartificial intelligencekidney calculinephrolithotomy, percutaneousrobotic surgical proceduresureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID35549460
PMCPMC12721606
OpenAlexW4280573438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.