Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35549242›Full record

ReviewChemical reviews2022

Direct Cell Radiolabeling for

Peter J Gawne, Francis Man, Philip J Blower, Rafael T M de Rosales

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemical reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 138 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Super-Resolution Ultrasound Based Cell Tracking With Polymeric Nanobubbles.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Stem cells therapy molecular tracking - the special focus on nuclear medicine.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Homotypic Targeting of [Pharmaceutics · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Efficient radiolabeling of mesoporous silica nanoparticles for single-cell PET imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter J GawneSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-8763-1045
Francis ManSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-5076-2180
Philip J BlowerSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6290-1590
Rafael T M de RosalesSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-0431-0535
St Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C48390/A21153Department of Health BRC-1215-20006Medical Research CouncilWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212885/Z/18/ZWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrival of cell-based therapies is a revolution in medicine. However, its safe clinical application in a rational manner depends on reliable, clinically applicable methods for determining the fate and trafficking of therapeutic cells in vivo using medical imaging techniques─known as in vivo cell tracking. Radionuclide imaging using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) has several advantages over other imaging modalities for cell tracking because of its high sensitivity (requiring low amounts of probe per cell for imaging) and whole-body quantitative imaging capability using clinically available scanners. For cell tracking with radionuclides, ex vivo direct cell radiolabeling, that is, radiolabeling cells before their administration, is the simplest and most robust method, allowing labeling of any cell type without the need for genetic modification. This Review covers the development and application of direct cell radiolabeling probes utilizing a variety of chemical approaches: organic and inorganic/coordination (radio)chemistry, nanomaterials, and biochemistry. We describe the key early developments and the most recent advances in the field, identifying advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches and informing future development and choice of methods for clinical and preclinical application.

Indexed as

Cell TrackingNanostructuresPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon

Identifiers

PMID35549242
PMCPMC9185691
OpenAlexW4280533134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.