Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35549088›Full record

ArticleACS synthetic biology2022

Pathway Engineering, Re-targeting, and Synthetic Scaffolding Improve the Production of Squalene in Plants.

Jacob D Bibik, Sarathi M Weraduwage, Aparajita Banerjee, Ka'shawn Robertson, Roberto Espinoza-Corral, Thomas D Sharkey, Peter K Lundquist, Björn R Hamberger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS synthetic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Plant engineering: advances, bottlenecks, and promise.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob D BibikCell and Molecular Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Sarathi M WeraduwageDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Aparajita BanerjeeDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Ka'shawn RobertsonDOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Roberto Espinoza-CorralDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Thomas D SharkeyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Peter K LundquistDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.
Björn R HambergerCell and Molecular Biology Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1249-1807
Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are increasingly becoming an option for sustainable bioproduction of chemicals and complex molecules like terpenoids. The triterpene squalene has a variety of biotechnological uses and is the precursor to a diverse array of triterpenoids, but we currently lack a sustainable strategy to produce large quantities for industrial applications. Here, we further establish engineered plants as a platform for production of squalene through pathway re-targeting and membrane scaffolding. The squalene biosynthetic pathway, which natively resides in the cytosol and endoplasmic reticulum, was re-targeted to plastids, where screening of diverse variants of enzymes at key steps improved squalene yields. The highest yielding enzymes were used to create biosynthetic scaffolds on co-engineered, cytosolic lipid droplets, resulting in squalene yields up to 0.58 mg/gFW or 318% higher than a cytosolic pathway without scaffolding during transient expression. These scaffolds were also re-targeted to plastids where they associated with membranes throughout, including the formation of plastoglobules or plastidial lipid droplets. Plastid scaffolding ameliorated the negative effects of squalene biosynthesis and showed up to 345% higher rates of photosynthesis than without scaffolding. This study establishes a platform for engineering the production of squalene in plants, providing the opportunity to expand future work into production of higher-value triterpenoids.

Indexed as

SqualeneTriterpenesBiosynthetic PathwaysMetabolic EngineeringPlants, Genetically ModifiedPlastidsSqualeneTriterpeneslipid droplet scaffoldingplastid membrane scaffoldingplastid targetingsqualene

Identifiers

PMID35549088
PMCPMC9208017
OpenAlexW4280519888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.