ArticleDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)2022
CT-based differentiation of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm and nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumor of pancreas.
Article in Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms (SPNs) of the Pancreas: Appraisal of Contemporary Clinicopathologic Features - Clinical Implications and Surgical Outcomes of Patients Treated and Followed at a Single Institution.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Differentiation of non-hypervascular non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms from solid pseudopapillary neoplasms using dual-layer spectral detector CT.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Comparison between solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cystic changes using computed tomography.World journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Massive extrapancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm misdiagnosed as hepatic tumor: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Challenging Diagnosis of Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen in the Tail of the Pancreas: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this paper was to distinguish solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) and nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumors (nf-NETs) of pancreas using univariate analysis and clinical-CT logistic regression model. METHODS Twenty-eight patients with SPNs and 46 patients with nf-NETs underwent enhanced CT examinations. Clinical data (sex, age), categorical (location, cystic degeneration, calcification, hemorrhage, and enhancement pattern), and numeric CT features (lesion long diameter, long/ short diameter ratio, tumor attenuation values and tumor/pancreas attenuation ratios at unenhanced phase [UP], arterial phase [AP], and venous phase [VP]) were recorded. The logistic regression model was constructed by stepwise forward method of binary logistic regression after univariate analysis. The corresponding operating characteristic curve (ROC) and nomogram were delineated. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of ROC were calculated. RESULTS The SPNs were observed more often in relatively young (P < .001), female (P < .001) patients. After the univariate analysis, the categorical CT features of location (P = .048), hemorrhage (P = .003), and enhancement pattern (P = .004) and the numeric CT features of lesion long diameter (P = .005), tumor/pancreasUP (P = .002), tumorAP (P < .001), and tumor/pancreasAP (P < .001) had statistical significance. The AUC (95% CI), sensitivity, and specificity of a logistic regression model composed of age, tumor/pancreasUP, and tumor/pancreasAP were 0.933 (95% CI, 0.850-0.978), 84.78%, and 92.86%. CONCLUSION The SPNs often occurred in 20- to 40-year-old female patients, were located in the body or tail of pancreas, showed hemorrhagic degeneration, heterogeneous enhancement, and were relatively larger in size compared with nf-NETs. Tumor/pancreasUP, tumorAP, and tumor/pancreasAP values of SPNs were smaller than those of nf-NETs. The clinical-CT logistic regression model and nomogram consisting of age, tumor/pancreasUP, and tumor/pancreasAP parameters helped to differentiate SPNs from nf-NETs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.