Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548857›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2022

High-Throughput Measurement and Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Collision Cross Sections for Drugs and Drug Metabolites.

Dylan H Ross, Ryan P Seguin, Allison M Krinsky, Libin Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dylan H RossDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Ryan P SeguinDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Allison M KrinskyDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.
Libin XuDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-5200

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug metabolite identification is a bottleneck of drug metabolism studies due to the need for time-consuming chromatographic separation and structural confirmation. Ion mobility-mass spectrometry (IM-MS), on the other hand, separates analytes on a rapid (millisecond) time scale and enables the measurement of collision cross section (CCS), a unique physical property related to an ion's gas-phase size and shape, which can be used as an additional parameter for identification of unknowns. A current limitation to the application of IM-MS to the identification of drug metabolites is the lack of reference CCS values. In this work, we assembled a large-scale database of drug and drug metabolite CCS values using high-throughput in vitro drug metabolite generation and a rapid IM-MS analysis with automated data processing. Subsequently, we used this database to train a machine learning-based CCS prediction model, employing a combination of conventional 2D molecular descriptors and novel 3D descriptors, achieving high prediction accuracies (0.8-2.2% median relative error on test set data). The inclusion of 3D information in the prediction model enables the prediction of different CCS values for different protomers, conformers, and positional isomers, which is not possible using conventional 2D descriptors. The prediction models, dmCCS, are available at https://CCSbase.net/dmccs_predictions.

Indexed as

Ion Mobility SpectrometryMachine LearningDatabases, FactualIonsMass SpectrometryIons

Identifiers

PMID35548857
PMCPMC9165597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.