Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548776›Full record

ArticleDisease markers2022

Tumor Suppressor Role and Clinical Significance of the

Yu-Xiang Liang, Ying-Ke Liang, Zhi-Hao Zou, Yang-Jia Zhuo, Jian-Heng Ye, Xue-Jin Zhu, Zhou-Da Cai, Zhuo-Yuan Lin, Ru-Jun Mo, Shu-Lin Wu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disease markers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [β-sitosterol, an important component in the fruits ofNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yu-Xiang LiangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1647-1259
Ying-Ke LiangDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8058-1973
Zhi-Hao ZouDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0702-2379
Yang-Jia ZhuoDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3061-7303
Jian-Heng YeDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-6465
Xue-Jin ZhuDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-1197
Zhou-Da CaiDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3717-2426
Zhuo-Yuan LinDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510260, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1697-6740
Ru-Jun MoDepartment of Urology, Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, Southern Medicine University, Dongguan 523059, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7350-6059
Shu-Lin WuDepartments of Urology and Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Yan-Qiong ZhangInstitute of Chinese Materia Medical, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-111X
Wei-De ZhongDepartment of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510180, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0430-2845

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In our previous research, we developed a 32-gene risk index model that may be utilized as a robust prognostic method for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) recurrence after surgery. Among the 32 genes, the Fifth Ewing Variant ( Methods: FEV mRNA expression was analyzed and correlated to clinical outcomes in PCa patients who underwent prostatectomy at the Massachusetts General Hospital. Specimens from tissue microarray (TMA) including 102 prostate cancer patients were analysis for the expression of FEV. Meanwhile, FEV expression profiles were also assessed in PCa cell lines and in BPH-1 prostate epithelial cells using western blotting and quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR). Furthermore, we transfected LNCaP and PC-3 cells with either an empty vector or full-length FEV gene and performed in vitro cell functional assays. The part FEV plays in tumor xenograft growth was also assessed in vivo. Results: Of the 191 patients included in this study base on the DASL dataset, 77 (40.3%) and 24 (13.6%), respectively, developed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse and metastasis postradical prostatectomy. Significant FEV downregulation was observed in PCa patients showing PSA failure and metastasis. The protein expression of FEV was significantly negatively correlated with the Gleason score and pathological stage in prostate cancer tissues. Similarly, FEV expression significantly decreased in all PCa cell lines relative to BPH-1 (all Conclusion: The results of this study suggest an association between downregulated FEV expression and PSA relapse in PCa patients. In addition, FEV may act as a tumor suppressor in PCa.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsTranscription FactorsCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenDNA-Binding ProteinsFEV protein, humanProstate-Specific AntigenTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID35548776
PMCPMC9085333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.