Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548523›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Water and Meadow Views Both Afford Perceived but Not Performance-Based Attention Restoration: Results From Two Experimental Studies.

Katherine A Johnson, Annabelle Pontvianne, Vi Ly, Rui Jin, Jonathan Haris Januar, Keitaro Machida, Leisa D Sargent, Kate E Lee, Nicholas S G Williams, Kathryn J H Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katherine A JohnsonMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Annabelle PontvianneMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Vi LyMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Rui JinMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Jonathan Haris JanuarMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Keitaro MachidaMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Leisa D SargentUNSW Business School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kate E LeeSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Nicholas S G WilliamsSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Kathryn J H WilliamsSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention Restoration Theory proposes that exposure to natural environments helps to restore attention. For sustained attention-the ongoing application of focus to a task, the effect appears to be modest, and the underlying mechanisms of attention restoration remain unclear. Exposure to nature may improve attention performance through many means: modulation of alertness and one's connection to nature were investigated here, in two separate studies. In both studies, participants performed the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) before and immediately after viewing a meadow, ocean, or urban image for 40 s, and then completed the Perceived Restorativeness Scale. In Study 1 (

Indexed as

alertnessattention restoration theoryconnectedness to naturemeadowpupillometrySARTsustained attentionwaterscape

Identifiers

PMID35548523
PMCPMC9084315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.