Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35548466›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2022

Patients with Primary and Secondary Bile Duct Stones Harbor Distinct Biliary Microbial Composition and Metabolic Potential.

Ru Feng, Tianyu Zhang, Masood Ur Rehman Kayani, Zhengting Wang, Yao Shen, Kenn Liu Su, Kouken Bielike, Lei Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ru FengCenter for Microbiota and Immunological Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Immunology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Tianyu ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Masood Ur Rehman KayaniCenter for Microbiota and Immunological Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Immunology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhengting WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yao ShenCenter for Microbiota and Immunological Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Immunology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kenn Liu SuCenter for Microbiota and Immunological Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Immunology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Kouken BielikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lei ChenCenter for Microbiota and Immunological Diseases, Shanghai Institute of Immunology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cholelithiasis has a high incidence worldwide and limited treatment options due to its poorly understood pathogenesis. Furthermore, the role of biliary microbiota in cholelithiasis remains understudied. To address these questions, we performed microbial sequencing from biliary samples from primary bile duct stone (PBDS) and secondary bile duct stone (SBDS) patients. Results: We analyzed in total 45 biliary samples, including those from cholelithiasis patients with PBDS or SBDS and people with other digestive diseases. 16S rRNA sequencing showed the bacteria family Alcaligenaceae increased in relative abundance in the lithiasis group compared with the non-lithiasis group. In addition, the PBDS group showed significantly lower bacterial diversity than SBDS, with Propionibacteriaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, and Lactobacillaceae as the most significant bacteria families decreased in relative abundance. We further performed whole metagenomic shotgun sequencing (wMGS) and found increased ability of biofilm synthesis and the ability to sense external stimuli in PBDS based on functional annotation of mapped reads. From genome-resolved analysis of the samples, we identified 36 high-quality draft bacterial genome sequences with completion ≥70% and contamination ≤10%. Most of these genomes were classified into Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, or Actinobacteria. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that there is a subtle impact on biliary microbiome from cholelithiasis while the difference is more pronounced between the PBDS and SBDS. It was revealed that the diversity of biliary microbiota in PBDS is lower, while some metabolic pathways are up-regulated, including those linked to higher incidence of different types of cancer, providing new insights for the understanding of cholelithiasis with different origin.

Indexed as

GallstonesMicrobiotaBacteriaHumansMetagenomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S sequencingbiliary microbiotacholelithiasisprimary bile duct stonesecondary bile duct stonewMGS sequencing

Identifiers

PMID35548466
PMCPMC9082501
OpenAlexW4224440670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.